Letter 16: He who maintains that it is possible to arrive at the discovery of things actually existing, has no doubt by some orderly method advanced his intelligence by means of the knowledge of actually existing things. It is after first training himself by the apprehension of small and easily comprehensible objects, that he brings his apprehensive facult...
Basil of Caesarea→Unknown|c. 358 AD|basil caesarea
arianismtravel mobility
Travel & mobility; Economic matters
Anyone who claims they can fully comprehend the nature of reality itself has presumably worked their way up methodically — starting with small, graspable things before tackling what lies beyond all human understanding.
So here's a test. You boast that you've grasped the nature of actual existence? Fine. Explain the nature of the smallest visible creature for me. Tell me everything about the ant.
Does it breathe? Does it have a skeleton? Are its parts held together by tendons and ligaments? Are the tendons wrapped in muscles and glands? Does it have a spinal cord running from head to tail along vertebrae? Does a nervous membrane drive its limbs? Does it have a liver — and a gall bladder beside it? Kidneys? A heart? Arteries, veins, membranes, cartilage? Is it hairy or hairless? Does it have a solid hoof, or are its feet divided? How long does it live? How does it reproduce? What is its gestation period? Why do some ants walk while others fly — some crawling on the ground, others traveling through the air?
The person who prides himself on knowing the nature of reality should be able to answer these questions about a common ant. Once he's done that, he can move on to giving us a physiological account of the Power that transcends all human intelligence.
But if your knowledge can't yet explain the nature of an insignificant ant, how can you claim to comprehend the nature of the incomprehensible God?
ST. BASIL OF CAESAREA
Against Eunomius the heretic.
He who maintains that it is possible to arrive at the discovery of things actually existing, has no doubt by some orderly method advanced his intelligence by means of the knowledge of actually existing things. It is after first training himself by the apprehension of small and easily comprehensible objects, that he brings his apprehensive faculty to bear on what is beyond all intelligence. He makes his boast that he has really arrived at the comprehension of actual existences; let him then explain to us the nature of the least of visible beings; let him tell us all about the ant. Does its life depend on breath and breathing? Has it a skeleton? Is its body connected by sinews and ligaments? Are its sinews surrounded with muscles and glands? Does its marrow go with dorsal vertebræ from brow to tail? Does it give impulse to its moving members by the enveloping nervous membrane? Has it a liver, with a gall bladder near the liver? Has it kidneys, heart, arteries, veins, membranes, cartilages? Is it hairy or hairless? Has it an uncloven hoof, or are its feet divided? How long does it live? What is its mode of reproduction? What is its period of gestation? How is it that ants neither all walk nor all fly, but some belong to creeping things, and some travel through the air? The man who glories in his knowledge of the really-existing ought to tell us in the meanwhile about the nature of the ant. Next let him give us a similar physiological account of the power that transcends all human intelligence. But if your knowledge has not yet been able to apprehend the nature of the insignificant ant, how can you boast yourself able to form a conception of the power of the incomprehensible God?
About this page
Source. Translated by Blomfield Jackson. From Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, Second Series, Vol. 8. Edited by Philip Schaff and Henry Wace. (Buffalo, NY: Christian Literature Publishing Co., 1895.) Revised and edited for New Advent by Kevin Knight. <https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/3202016.htm>.
Contact information. The editor of New Advent is Kevin Knight. My email address is feedback732 at newadvent.org. (To help fight spam, this address might change occasionally.) Regrettably, I can't reply to every letter, but I greatly appreciate your feedback — especially notifications about typographical errors and inappropriate ads.
◆
Anyone who claims they can fully comprehend the nature of reality itself has presumably worked their way up methodically — starting with small, graspable things before tackling what lies beyond all human understanding.
So here's a test. You boast that you've grasped the nature of actual existence? Fine. Explain the nature of the smallest visible creature for me. Tell me everything about the ant.
Does it breathe? Does it have a skeleton? Are its parts held together by tendons and ligaments? Are the tendons wrapped in muscles and glands? Does it have a spinal cord running from head to tail along vertebrae? Does a nervous membrane drive its limbs? Does it have a liver — and a gall bladder beside it? Kidneys? A heart? Arteries, veins, membranes, cartilage? Is it hairy or hairless? Does it have a solid hoof, or are its feet divided? How long does it live? How does it reproduce? What is its gestation period? Why do some ants walk while others fly — some crawling on the ground, others traveling through the air?
The person who prides himself on knowing the nature of reality should be able to answer these questions about a common ant. Once he's done that, he can move on to giving us a physiological account of the Power that transcends all human intelligence.
But if your knowledge can't yet explain the nature of an insignificant ant, how can you claim to comprehend the nature of the incomprehensible God?
Modern English rendering for readability. See the 19th-century translation or original Latin/Greek for scholarly use.