Marcus Tullius Cicero→Unknown|c. 56 BC|Cicero|From Rome|AI-assisted
However I could have managed it, I would have met you if you had chosen to come to the place agreed on. So although, out of regard for my convenience, you were unwilling to disturb me, I want you to believe that if you had sent word, I would have preferred your wish to my convenience.
I could answer your letter in more detail if my secretary, Marcus Tullius, were with me. At any rate I am sure that in making up the accounts, whatever may be true in other matters, he knowingly did nothing against your interest or reputation. And I can assure you of this: if the old rule and ancient custom for handing in accounts had remained in force, I would never have submitted them until I had first checked and settled them with you, as our close official connection required.
What I would have done outside Rome under the old custom, I did in the province, because the Julian law required me to leave accounts in the province and to file an exact copy of them at the treasury. I did not do this to force you to adopt my calculation. I placed great trust in you, and I will never regret doing so. I put my secretary, whom I now see you suspect, entirely under your control; and you joined your brother Marcus Mindius with him in the business. The accounts were made up in my absence under your eye, and I did nothing to them except read them. When I received a copy from my secretary, I considered that I had received it from your brother.
If this was a courtesy, I could not have paid you a greater one. If it was an act of trust, I showed almost more trust in you than in myself. If my duty was to see that nothing was entered that was not for your honor and advantage, there was no one to whom I could have entrusted the matter in preference to the man to whom I did entrust it. In any case, I merely obeyed the law by depositing in two cities, Laodicea and Apamea, copies of the accounts made up and audited there. I regarded those as the two chief cities, as the law required the chief cities.
So my first answer is this: although I hurried for good and sufficient reasons to file the accounts at the treasury, I would have waited for you had I not considered that depositing the accounts in the province amounted to filing them at the treasury.
What you say about Volusius has nothing to do with the accounts. I have been advised by experts, among them Gaius Camillus, the best lawyer of the day and a very kind friend of mine, that the debt, which was not 3,000 sestertia as you say but 1,900, could not be transferred from Valerius to Volusius, and that Valerius's sureties were liable. Money had been paid to us in Valerius's name as purchaser; the balance I entered in the accounts.
But your proposal robs me of the fruit of my generosity, my activity, and even, though I care less about this, a moderate amount of good sense. It robs me of generosity because you prefer to suppose that my legate and my prefect, Quintus Lepta, were saved from a very serious disaster by the good offices of my secretary rather than by me, although they should never have been made liable. It robs me of activity because you suppose that, in so important a duty and so serious a danger, I knew nothing and took no thought, and that my secretary made whatever entry he pleased without even reading it over to me. It robs me of good sense because you think an arrangement I had worked out with some care had in practice not been considered at all.
The truth is that the release of Volusius was my own design. I also devised the plan for relieving Valerius's sureties and Titus Marius himself from so heavy a loss. This plan has not only everyone's approval but their warm praise. If you want the plain truth, I saw that my secretary was the one person who did not like it. But my view was that, so long as the Roman people received what belonged to them, a good man should consider the interests of so many people, whether friends or fellow citizens.
As for Lucceius, the arrangement made at Pompey's suggestion was that the money should be deposited in a temple. I acknowledged that this was done on my order. Pompey has used that money, just as Sestius used the money deposited by you. I know this does not affect you. I would have been sorry to omit recording that you deposited the money in the temple on my order, had that sum not been attested by records of the most solemn and precise kind, stating to whom it was paid, by what decree of the senate, and under what written order from you and from me it had been handed over to Publius Sestius. Since these facts had been recorded in so many ways that no mistake was possible, I did not make an entry which, after all, had no reference to you.
Still, I now wish I had made the entry, since I see that you regret its absence. I quite agree that you are obliged, as you say, to enter this transaction, and your balance will not differ from mine at all by doing so. You may also add "on my authority." Although I did not add that phrase, I have no reason to deny it, nor would I deny it even if there had been such a reason and you had declined to add it.
As for the 900,000 sesterces, that at least was entered according to your own wishes or your brother's. If there is any entry I can still correct in my accounts, since the posting of the public ledger is not complete, I must consider what room the laws allow me, since I have not used the decree of the senate. At any rate, unless I am mistaken, and there are others with more technical knowledge than I have, you were not bound to make your entry about the amount collected match my accounts.
Please do not doubt that I will do everything I think is in your interest or in accordance with your wish, if I possibly can. As for the list for good-service rewards, you should know that I have returned the names of my military tribunes, prefects, and staff members, at least those of my own staff. In this matter I made a mistake. I thought there was no time limit for submitting their names; afterward I was told that it had to be done within thirty days of filing my accounts. I am very sorry that this list was not reserved to enhance your credit rather than mine, since I have no promotion to seek. But nothing has yet been done about the centurions and the subalterns of the military tribunes, because rewards of that class have no legal time limit.
The last item is the 100,000 sesterces. I remember receiving a letter from you at Myrina acknowledging that the mistake was not mine but yours. The mistake, if it was a mistake, seemed to have originated with your brother and Tullius. But since it could not be corrected, for I had already deposited my accounts and left the province, I believe I answered you as politely as my warm feeling and my financial outlook at the time allowed.
I did not then think I was bound by the polite tone of my letter, and I do not now think I was bound to treat your letter about the 100 sestertia as men treat demands for payment in times like these. At the same time, you ought to consider this. The whole sum legally coming to me I deposited with the tax contractors at Ephesus. It amounted to 2,200,000 sesterces. Pompey has appropriated the whole of it. Whether I bear that patiently or not, you at least should bear the loss of 100 sestertia calmly, and count it as so much less that has come into your pocket from your own allowances or from my generosity.
Even if you had debited me with this 100 sestertia, your kindness and affection toward me are such that you would not want to distrain on me at a time like this; for however much I might want the money paid in cash, I do not have it. Take this as a joke, just as I take what you said. When Tullius returns from the country, I will send him to you, if you think that will be useful. I have no reason to want this letter not to be torn up.
CCCI (Fam. V, 20) TO MESCINIUS RUFUS OUTSIDE ROME (JANUARY) I would have done my very best to meet you, if you had chosen to come to the place arranged. Wherefore, although from regard to my convenience you were unwilling to disturb me, I should wish you to believe that, if you had sent me word, I should have preferred your wish to my own convenience. In reply to your letter, I Should have been able to write to you on the details more conveniently, if my secretary, M. Tullius , had been with me. lie, I feel certain, at any rate in making up the accounts — I cannot speak of other things-did not knowingly do anything adverse to your interest or your reputation. And in the next place I can assure you that, if the old rule and ancient custom as to giving in accounts had been in force, I should never have given them in until I had first checked and made them up with you, as our close official connexion demanded. What I should have done outside Rome , had the old custom remained in force, that I did in the province, because, by the Julian law, it was necessary to leave accounts in the province and to give in a verbatim copy of them at the treasury. I did not do this with a view of forcing you to adopt my calculation; but I put a great confidence in you, and shall never be sorry that I did so. For I handed over my secretary to your entire control — of whom I now see that you entertain suspicions — and you joined your brother M. Mindius with him in the business. The accounts were made up, in my absence, under your eye, to which I did nothing whatever beyond reading them. When I received a copy from my secretary, I regarded it as received from your brother. If that was a compliment, I could not pay you a greater one: if it was an instance of confidence, I have shown you almost more than I showed myself: if my duty had been to see that nothing was entered in them that was not for your honour and advantage, there was no one to whom I could have intrusted them in preference to the man to whom I did do so. At any rate, I merely obeyed the law by depositing copies of the accounts made up and audited in two cities, Laodicea and Apamea , which I regarded as the two chief cities (for it had to be the chief cities). So then to this point my first reply is that, though for good and sufficient reasons I have made haste to give in the accounts at the treasury, yet I should have waited for you, had I not considered that depositing the accounts in the province was tantamount to giving them in at the treasury. As to what you say of Volusius , that has nothing to do with the accounts. I have been advised by experts-among them by C Camillus , the best lawyer of the day and a very kind friend of mine — that the debt (the amount was not 3,000 sestertia, as you say, but 1,900) could not be transferred from Valerius to Volusius , and that the sureties of Valerius were liable. For a sum of money had been paid us in the name of Valerius as purchaser: the balance I entered in the accounts. But your proposal robs me of the fruit of my liberality, of my activity, and even (what, after all, I do not much care about) of a moderate amount of good sense: of my liberality, because you prefer to suppose my legate and my prefect, Q. Lepta, to have been relieved from a most serious calamity by the good offices of my secretary rather than of myself, and that though they ought never to have been made liable: of my activity, because you suppose that in regard to so important a duty, I may say so grave a danger, I neither knew anything nor took any thought — that my secretary made any entry he chose without even going through the form of reading it over to me: of my good sense, because you think that an arrangement, which had been thought out by me with no little acuteness, had been practically not thought of at all. The fact of the matter is that the release of Volusius was my own design, and I also formed the plan for relieving the securities of Valerius and Tit. Marius himself from so heavy a loss. And this scheme has not only the approval of everybody, but their warm commendation, and, if you wish to know the real truth, I perceived that my secretary was the one person who did not like it. But it was my view that, so long as the People got its own, a good man should consult for the interests of so large a number-whether of friends or fellow citizens. As regards Lucceius , the arrangement Come to, at the suggestion of Pompey , was that the money should be deposited in a temple. I acknowledged that as having been done on my order. This money Pompey has employed, as Sestius did that deposited by you. But this, I am aware, does not affect you. I should have been sorry to have omitted to record your having deposited the money in the temple on my order, had not that sum been attested by records of the most solemn and precise nature — stating to whom it was paid, by what decree of the senate, and in virtue of what written order from you and from myself it had been handed over to P. Sestius . Seeing that these facts had been put on record in so many ways, that a mistake in regard to them was impossible, I did not make an entry, which after all had no reference to you. However, I wish now I had made the entry, since I see that you regret its not having been done. I quite agree as to your being obliged, as you Say, to enter this transaction, and your balance will not differ at all from mine by your doing so. You may add also, “on my authority,” which, though I did not add it, I have no reason for denying, nor should deny, had there been any such reason, and had you declined to add it. Again, as to the sum of 900,000 sesterces: that, at any rate, was entered in accordance with your own or your brother's wishes. However, if there is any entry (for the posting of the public ledger is not Completed) which I can correct even now in my accounts, I must consider — since I have not taken advantage of the decree of the senate — what grace the laws allow me. Anyhow, you were not bound to make the entry you have made in regard to the amount collected tally with my accounts, unless I am mistaken-for there are others with more technical knowledge than myself. But pray do not doubt my doing everything that I think to be for your interests or in accordance with your wish, if I possibly can. As to what you say about the list for good-service rewards, you must know that I have returned the names of my military tribunes and prefects, and the members of the staff — at least of my own staff. In this matter, indeed, I made a mistake. I thought that the time allowed me for giving in their names was unlimited: I was afterwards in-formed that it had to be done within thirty days of handing in my accounts. I am very sorry that this list for good-service rewards was not reserved to enhance your credit rather than mine, since I have no promotion to work for. However, in regard to the centurions and the subalterns of the military tribunes, nothing has yet been done, for good-service rewards of that class have no time limit by law. The last item is the 100,000 sesterces, in regard to which I remember receiving a letter from you from Myrina acknowledging the mistake to be not mine, but yours. The mistake — if mistake it was — appeared to have originated with your brother and Tullius . But since it could not be corrected — for I had already deposited my accounts and quitted my province — I believe I answered you as politely as the warmth of my feelings dictated and my financial outlook at the time allowed. But I did not either then consider that I was bound by the polite tone of my letter, nor do I now think that I was bound to have regarded your letter about the 100 sestertia in the light in which men regard dunning letters received in times like these. At the same time you ought to take this into consideration. The whole sum of money legally coming to me I deposited with the publicani at Ephesus . It amounted to 2,200,000 sesterces. The whole of it has been appropriated by Pompey . Whether I submit to that with patience or the reverse, you at least ought to take the loss of 100 sestertia with equanimity, and to reckon that just so much the less has come into your pocket from your own allowances or my liberality. But even if you had debited me with this 100 sestertia, yet your kindness and affection for me is such that you would not wish to distrain on me at such a time as this: for, however much I wished the money paid in cash, I have not the wherewithal. But regard this as a joke, just as I do what you said. However, as soon as Tullius comes back from the country, I will send him to you, if you think that will be any good. I have no reason for wishing this letter not to be torn up.
XX. Scr. ad urbem medio mense Ianuario a.u.c. 705. CICERO RUFO.
Quoquo modo potuissem, te convenissem, si eo, quo constitueras, venire voluisses; quare, etsi mei commodi causa commovere me noluisti, tamen ita existimes velim, me antelaturum fuisse, si ad me misisses, voluntatem tuam commodo meo. Ad ea, quae scripsisti, commodius equidem possem de singulis ad te rebus scribere, si M. Tullius, scriba meus, adesset: a quo mihi exploratum est in rationibus dumtaxat referendis—de ceteris rebus affirmare non possum—nihil eum fecisse scientem, quod esset contra aut rem aut existimationem tuam; dein, si rationum referendarum ius vetus et mos antiquus maneret, me relaturum rationes, nisi tecum pro coniunctione nostrae necessitudinis contulissem confecissemque, non fuisse. Quod igitur fecissem ad urbem, si consuetudo pristina maneret, id, quoniam lege Iulia relinquere rationes in provincia necesse erat easdemque totidem verbis referre ad aerarium, feci in provincia, neque ita feci, ut te ad meum arbitrium adducerem, sed tribui tibi tantum, quantum me tribuisse numquam me poenitebit: totum enim scribam meum, quem tibi video nunc esse suspectum, tibi tradidi; tu ei M. Mindium, fratrem tuum, adiunxisti; rationes confectae me absente sunt tecum, ad quas ego nihil adhibui praeter lectionem; ita accepi librum a meo scriba, ut eundem acceperim a fratre tuo. Si honos is fuit, maiorem tibi habere non potui; si fides, maiorem tibi habui quam paene ipsi mihi; si providendum fuit, ne quid aliter, ac tibi et honestum et utile esset, referretur, non habui, cui potius id negotii darem, quam cui dederam. Illud quidem certe factum est, quod lex iubebat, ut apud duas civitates, Laodiceensem et Apameensem, quae nobis maximae videbantur, quoniam ita necesse erat, rationes confectas collatas deponeremus. Itaque huic loco primum respondeo me, quamquam iustis de causis rationes referre properarim, tamen te exspectaturum fuisse, nisi in provincia relictas rationes pro relatis haberem; quamobrem * * * *. De Volusio quod scribis, non est id rationum; docuerunt enim me periti homines, in iis cum omnium peritissimus, tum mihi amicissimus, C. Camillus, ad Volusium traferri nomen a Valerio non potuisse, praedes Valerianos teneri. Neque id erat HS XXX, ut scribis, sed HS XIX; erat enim curata nobis pecunia Valerii mancipis nomine, ex qua reliquum quod erat, in rationibus rettuli. Sed sic me et liberalitatis fructu privas et diligentiae et, quod minime tamen laboro, mediocris etiam prudentiae: liberalitatis, quod mavis scribae mei beneficio quam meo legatum meum ** praefectumque Q. Leptam maxima calamitate levatos cum praesertim non deberent esse obligati; diligentiae, quod existimas de tanto officio meo, tanto etiam periculo nec scisse me quidquam nec cogitavisse, scribam, quidquid voluisset, cum id mihi ne recitavisset quidem, retulisse; prudentiae, quod rem a me non insipienter excogitatam ne cogitatam quidem putas. Nam et Volusii liberandi meum fuit consilium et, ut multa tam gravis Valerianis praedibus ipsique T. Mario depelleretur, a me inita ratio est, quam quidem omnes non solum probant, sed etiam laudant, et, si verum scire vis, hoc uni scribae meo intellexi non nimium placere; sed ego putavi esse viri boni, cum populus suum servaret, consulere fortunis tot vel amicorum vel civium. Nam de Lucceio est ita actum, ut auctore Cn. Pompeio ista pecunia in fano poneretur; id ego agnovi meo iussu esse factum: qua pecunia Pompeius est usus, ut ea, quam tu deposueras, Sestius; sed hoc ad te nihil intelligo pertinere: illud me non animadvertisse moleste ferrem, ut ascriberem te in fano pecuniam iussu meo deposuisse, nisi ista pecunia gravissimis esset certissimisque monumentis testata, cui data, quo senatus consulto, quibus tuis, quibus meis litteris P. Sestio tradita esset; quae cum viderem tot vestigiis impressa, ut in iis errari non posset, non ascripsi id, quod tua nihil referebat; ego tamen ascripsisse mallem, quoniam id te video desiderare. Sicut scribis, tibi id esse referendum, item ipse sentio, neque in eo quidquam a meis rationibus discrepabunt tuae; addes enim tu, meo iussu, quod ego, qui non addidi, nec causa est cur negem nec, si causa esset et tu nolles, negarem. Nam de HS. nongentis milibus certe ita relatum est, ut tu sive frater tuus referri voluit; sed, si quid est, quoniam de logaeo parum provisum est, quod ego in rationibus referendis etiam nunc corrigere possim, de eo mihi, quoniam senatus consulto non sum usus, quid per leges liceat, considerandum est: te certe in pecuniae exactae ita efferre ex meis rationibus relatis non oportuit, nisi quid me fallit, sunt enim alii peritiores. Illud cave dubites, quin ego omnia faciam, quae interesse tua aut etiam velle te existimem, si ullo modo facere possim. Quod scribis de beneficiis, scito a me et tribunos militares et praefectos et contubernales dumtaxat meos delatos esse: in quo quidem me ratio fefellit; liberum enim mihi tempus ad eos deferendos existimabam dari, postea certior sum factus triginta diebus deferri necesse esse, quibus rationes rettulissem. Sane moleste tuli non illa beneficia tuae potius ambitioni reservata esse quam meae, qui ambitione nihil uterer; de centurionibus tamen et de tribunorum militarium contubernalibus res est in integro, genus enim horum beneficiorum definitum lege non erat. Reliquum est de HS. centum milibus, de quibus memini mihi a te Myrina litteras esse allatas, non mei errati, sed tui, in quo peccatum videbatur esse, si modo erat, fratris tui et Tullii; sed, cum id corrigi non posset, quod iam depositis rationibus ex provincia decesseramus, credo me quidem tibi pro animi mei voluntate proque ea spe facultatum, quam tum habebamus, quam humanissime potuerim, rescripsisse, sed neque tum me humanitate litterarum mearum obligatum puto neque me tuam hodie epistulam de HS. centum sic accepisse, ut ii accipiunt, quibus epistulae per haec tempora molestae sunt. Simul illud cogitare debes, me omnem pecuniam, quae ad me salvis legibus pervenisset, Ephesi apud publicanos deposuisse, id fuisse HS. XXII., eam omnem pecuniam Pompeium abstulisse; quod ego sive aequo animo sive iniquo fero, tu de HS. centum aequo animo ferre debes et existimare eo minus ad te vel de tuis cibariis vel de mea liberalitate pervenisse. Quod si mihi expensa ista HS. centum tulisses, tamen, quae tua est suavitas quique in me amor, nolles a me hoc tempore aestimationem accipere; nam, numeratum si cuperem, non erat. Sed haec iocatum me putato, ut ego te existimo; ego tamen, cum Tullius rure redierit, mittam eum ad te, si quid ad rem putabis pertinere. Hanc epistulam cur non scindi velim, causa nulla est.
◆
However I could have managed it, I would have met you if you had chosen to come to the place agreed on. So although, out of regard for my convenience, you were unwilling to disturb me, I want you to believe that if you had sent word, I would have preferred your wish to my convenience.
I could answer your letter in more detail if my secretary, Marcus Tullius, were with me. At any rate I am sure that in making up the accounts, whatever may be true in other matters, he knowingly did nothing against your interest or reputation. And I can assure you of this: if the old rule and ancient custom for handing in accounts had remained in force, I would never have submitted them until I had first checked and settled them with you, as our close official connection required.
What I would have done outside Rome under the old custom, I did in the province, because the Julian law required me to leave accounts in the province and to file an exact copy of them at the treasury. I did not do this to force you to adopt my calculation. I placed great trust in you, and I will never regret doing so. I put my secretary, whom I now see you suspect, entirely under your control; and you joined your brother Marcus Mindius with him in the business. The accounts were made up in my absence under your eye, and I did nothing to them except read them. When I received a copy from my secretary, I considered that I had received it from your brother.
If this was a courtesy, I could not have paid you a greater one. If it was an act of trust, I showed almost more trust in you than in myself. If my duty was to see that nothing was entered that was not for your honor and advantage, there was no one to whom I could have entrusted the matter in preference to the man to whom I did entrust it. In any case, I merely obeyed the law by depositing in two cities, Laodicea and Apamea, copies of the accounts made up and audited there. I regarded those as the two chief cities, as the law required the chief cities.
So my first answer is this: although I hurried for good and sufficient reasons to file the accounts at the treasury, I would have waited for you had I not considered that depositing the accounts in the province amounted to filing them at the treasury.
What you say about Volusius has nothing to do with the accounts. I have been advised by experts, among them Gaius Camillus, the best lawyer of the day and a very kind friend of mine, that the debt, which was not 3,000 sestertia as you say but 1,900, could not be transferred from Valerius to Volusius, and that Valerius's sureties were liable. Money had been paid to us in Valerius's name as purchaser; the balance I entered in the accounts.
But your proposal robs me of the fruit of my generosity, my activity, and even, though I care less about this, a moderate amount of good sense. It robs me of generosity because you prefer to suppose that my legate and my prefect, Quintus Lepta, were saved from a very serious disaster by the good offices of my secretary rather than by me, although they should never have been made liable. It robs me of activity because you suppose that, in so important a duty and so serious a danger, I knew nothing and took no thought, and that my secretary made whatever entry he pleased without even reading it over to me. It robs me of good sense because you think an arrangement I had worked out with some care had in practice not been considered at all.
The truth is that the release of Volusius was my own design. I also devised the plan for relieving Valerius's sureties and Titus Marius himself from so heavy a loss. This plan has not only everyone's approval but their warm praise. If you want the plain truth, I saw that my secretary was the one person who did not like it. But my view was that, so long as the Roman people received what belonged to them, a good man should consider the interests of so many people, whether friends or fellow citizens.
As for Lucceius, the arrangement made at Pompey's suggestion was that the money should be deposited in a temple. I acknowledged that this was done on my order. Pompey has used that money, just as Sestius used the money deposited by you. I know this does not affect you. I would have been sorry to omit recording that you deposited the money in the temple on my order, had that sum not been attested by records of the most solemn and precise kind, stating to whom it was paid, by what decree of the senate, and under what written order from you and from me it had been handed over to Publius Sestius. Since these facts had been recorded in so many ways that no mistake was possible, I did not make an entry which, after all, had no reference to you.
Still, I now wish I had made the entry, since I see that you regret its absence. I quite agree that you are obliged, as you say, to enter this transaction, and your balance will not differ from mine at all by doing so. You may also add "on my authority." Although I did not add that phrase, I have no reason to deny it, nor would I deny it even if there had been such a reason and you had declined to add it.
As for the 900,000 sesterces, that at least was entered according to your own wishes or your brother's. If there is any entry I can still correct in my accounts, since the posting of the public ledger is not complete, I must consider what room the laws allow me, since I have not used the decree of the senate. At any rate, unless I am mistaken, and there are others with more technical knowledge than I have, you were not bound to make your entry about the amount collected match my accounts.
Please do not doubt that I will do everything I think is in your interest or in accordance with your wish, if I possibly can. As for the list for good-service rewards, you should know that I have returned the names of my military tribunes, prefects, and staff members, at least those of my own staff. In this matter I made a mistake. I thought there was no time limit for submitting their names; afterward I was told that it had to be done within thirty days of filing my accounts. I am very sorry that this list was not reserved to enhance your credit rather than mine, since I have no promotion to seek. But nothing has yet been done about the centurions and the subalterns of the military tribunes, because rewards of that class have no legal time limit.
The last item is the 100,000 sesterces. I remember receiving a letter from you at Myrina acknowledging that the mistake was not mine but yours. The mistake, if it was a mistake, seemed to have originated with your brother and Tullius. But since it could not be corrected, for I had already deposited my accounts and left the province, I believe I answered you as politely as my warm feeling and my financial outlook at the time allowed.
I did not then think I was bound by the polite tone of my letter, and I do not now think I was bound to treat your letter about the 100 sestertia as men treat demands for payment in times like these. At the same time, you ought to consider this. The whole sum legally coming to me I deposited with the tax contractors at Ephesus. It amounted to 2,200,000 sesterces. Pompey has appropriated the whole of it. Whether I bear that patiently or not, you at least should bear the loss of 100 sestertia calmly, and count it as so much less that has come into your pocket from your own allowances or from my generosity.
Even if you had debited me with this 100 sestertia, your kindness and affection toward me are such that you would not want to distrain on me at a time like this; for however much I might want the money paid in cash, I do not have it. Take this as a joke, just as I take what you said. When Tullius returns from the country, I will send him to you, if you think that will be useful. I have no reason to want this letter not to be torn up.
AI-assisted translation - This translation was produced with AI assistance and has not been peer-reviewed. See the 19th-century translation or original Latin/Greek below for scholarly use.
Latin / Greek Original
XX. Scr. ad urbem medio mense Ianuario a.u.c. 705. CICERO RUFO.
Quoquo modo potuissem, te convenissem, si eo, quo constitueras, venire voluisses; quare, etsi mei commodi causa commovere me noluisti, tamen ita existimes velim, me antelaturum fuisse, si ad me misisses, voluntatem tuam commodo meo. Ad ea, quae scripsisti, commodius equidem possem de singulis ad te rebus scribere, si M. Tullius, scriba meus, adesset: a quo mihi exploratum est in rationibus dumtaxat referendis—de ceteris rebus affirmare non possum—nihil eum fecisse scientem, quod esset contra aut rem aut existimationem tuam; dein, si rationum referendarum ius vetus et mos antiquus maneret, me relaturum rationes, nisi tecum pro coniunctione nostrae necessitudinis contulissem confecissemque, non fuisse. Quod igitur fecissem ad urbem, si consuetudo pristina maneret, id, quoniam lege Iulia relinquere rationes in provincia necesse erat easdemque totidem verbis referre ad aerarium, feci in provincia, neque ita feci, ut te ad meum arbitrium adducerem, sed tribui tibi tantum, quantum me tribuisse numquam me poenitebit: totum enim scribam meum, quem tibi video nunc esse suspectum, tibi tradidi; tu ei M. Mindium, fratrem tuum, adiunxisti; rationes confectae me absente sunt tecum, ad quas ego nihil adhibui praeter lectionem; ita accepi librum a meo scriba, ut eundem acceperim a fratre tuo. Si honos is fuit, maiorem tibi habere non potui; si fides, maiorem tibi habui quam paene ipsi mihi; si providendum fuit, ne quid aliter, ac tibi et honestum et utile esset, referretur, non habui, cui potius id negotii darem, quam cui dederam. Illud quidem certe factum est, quod lex iubebat, ut apud duas civitates, Laodiceensem et Apameensem, quae nobis maximae videbantur, quoniam ita necesse erat, rationes confectas collatas deponeremus. Itaque huic loco primum respondeo me, quamquam iustis de causis rationes referre properarim, tamen te exspectaturum fuisse, nisi in provincia relictas rationes pro relatis haberem; quamobrem * * * *. De Volusio quod scribis, non est id rationum; docuerunt enim me periti homines, in iis cum omnium peritissimus, tum mihi amicissimus, C. Camillus, ad Volusium traferri nomen a Valerio non potuisse, praedes Valerianos teneri. Neque id erat HS XXX, ut scribis, sed HS XIX; erat enim curata nobis pecunia Valerii mancipis nomine, ex qua reliquum quod erat, in rationibus rettuli. Sed sic me et liberalitatis fructu privas et diligentiae et, quod minime tamen laboro, mediocris etiam prudentiae: liberalitatis, quod mavis scribae mei beneficio quam meo legatum meum ** praefectumque Q. Leptam maxima calamitate levatos cum praesertim non deberent esse obligati; diligentiae, quod existimas de tanto officio meo, tanto etiam periculo nec scisse me quidquam nec cogitavisse, scribam, quidquid voluisset, cum id mihi ne recitavisset quidem, retulisse; prudentiae, quod rem a me non insipienter excogitatam ne cogitatam quidem putas. Nam et Volusii liberandi meum fuit consilium et, ut multa tam gravis Valerianis praedibus ipsique T. Mario depelleretur, a me inita ratio est, quam quidem omnes non solum probant, sed etiam laudant, et, si verum scire vis, hoc uni scribae meo intellexi non nimium placere; sed ego putavi esse viri boni, cum populus suum servaret, consulere fortunis tot vel amicorum vel civium. Nam de Lucceio est ita actum, ut auctore Cn. Pompeio ista pecunia in fano poneretur; id ego agnovi meo iussu esse factum: qua pecunia Pompeius est usus, ut ea, quam tu deposueras, Sestius; sed hoc ad te nihil intelligo pertinere: illud me non animadvertisse moleste ferrem, ut ascriberem te in fano pecuniam iussu meo deposuisse, nisi ista pecunia gravissimis esset certissimisque monumentis testata, cui data, quo senatus consulto, quibus tuis, quibus meis litteris P. Sestio tradita esset; quae cum viderem tot vestigiis impressa, ut in iis errari non posset, non ascripsi id, quod tua nihil referebat; ego tamen ascripsisse mallem, quoniam id te video desiderare. Sicut scribis, tibi id esse referendum, item ipse sentio, neque in eo quidquam a meis rationibus discrepabunt tuae; addes enim tu, meo iussu, quod ego, qui non addidi, nec causa est cur negem nec, si causa esset et tu nolles, negarem. Nam de HS. nongentis milibus certe ita relatum est, ut tu sive frater tuus referri voluit; sed, si quid est, quoniam de logaeo parum provisum est, quod ego in rationibus referendis etiam nunc corrigere possim, de eo mihi, quoniam senatus consulto non sum usus, quid per leges liceat, considerandum est: te certe in pecuniae exactae ita efferre ex meis rationibus relatis non oportuit, nisi quid me fallit, sunt enim alii peritiores. Illud cave dubites, quin ego omnia faciam, quae interesse tua aut etiam velle te existimem, si ullo modo facere possim. Quod scribis de beneficiis, scito a me et tribunos militares et praefectos et contubernales dumtaxat meos delatos esse: in quo quidem me ratio fefellit; liberum enim mihi tempus ad eos deferendos existimabam dari, postea certior sum factus triginta diebus deferri necesse esse, quibus rationes rettulissem. Sane moleste tuli non illa beneficia tuae potius ambitioni reservata esse quam meae, qui ambitione nihil uterer; de centurionibus tamen et de tribunorum militarium contubernalibus res est in integro, genus enim horum beneficiorum definitum lege non erat. Reliquum est de HS. centum milibus, de quibus memini mihi a te Myrina litteras esse allatas, non mei errati, sed tui, in quo peccatum videbatur esse, si modo erat, fratris tui et Tullii; sed, cum id corrigi non posset, quod iam depositis rationibus ex provincia decesseramus, credo me quidem tibi pro animi mei voluntate proque ea spe facultatum, quam tum habebamus, quam humanissime potuerim, rescripsisse, sed neque tum me humanitate litterarum mearum obligatum puto neque me tuam hodie epistulam de HS. centum sic accepisse, ut ii accipiunt, quibus epistulae per haec tempora molestae sunt. Simul illud cogitare debes, me omnem pecuniam, quae ad me salvis legibus pervenisset, Ephesi apud publicanos deposuisse, id fuisse HS. XXII., eam omnem pecuniam Pompeium abstulisse; quod ego sive aequo animo sive iniquo fero, tu de HS. centum aequo animo ferre debes et existimare eo minus ad te vel de tuis cibariis vel de mea liberalitate pervenisse. Quod si mihi expensa ista HS. centum tulisses, tamen, quae tua est suavitas quique in me amor, nolles a me hoc tempore aestimationem accipere; nam, numeratum si cuperem, non erat. Sed haec iocatum me putato, ut ego te existimo; ego tamen, cum Tullius rure redierit, mittam eum ad te, si quid ad rem putabis pertinere. Hanc epistulam cur non scindi velim, causa nulla est.