Letter 51

Cyprian of CarthageAntonianus About Cornelius and Novatian|c. 254 AD|cyprian carthage
education booksgrief deathhumorillnessimperial politicsproperty economicswomen

Cyprian to his brother Antonianus, greetings.

I received your first letters, dearest brother, in which you held firmly to the unity of the bishops and adhered to the Catholic Church. You told me you were not in communion with Novatian, but were following my counsel and maintaining a common agreement with our fellow bishop Cornelius. You even asked me to forward a copy of your letter to Cornelius, so he could set aside any anxiety and know that you held communion with him — that is, with the Catholic Church.

But then came a second letter, sent by our co-presbyter Quintus, and I noticed your mind had begun to waver. After settling your position firmly, you now asked me to write again explaining what heresy Novatian had introduced, and on what grounds Cornelius holds communion with Trophimus and those who had sacrificed. If this questioning comes from careful concern for the faith — a diligent search for truth in a doubtful matter — then the anxious caution of a mind that fears God is not to be blamed.

But I see you have been shaken by Novatian's letters, so let me be direct: serious people, once they have planted their feet on solid rock, do not get blown about by every breeze — let alone every gale. Their mind does not shift and wobble with every opinion that rushes at them. That Novatian's letters should do this to you troubles me. So I will lay out the facts, as you asked.

First, about my own position. I must tell you that I initially held — and rightly so — that those who had lapsed could not simply be readmitted without a long and careful process of repentance. I insisted on this. But the question was never whether to show mercy, only when and how. When a new wave of persecution threatened, the bishops met in council and decided that those who had been doing penance should be readmitted and armed with communion for the coming fight. If the battle was at the gates, the soldiers needed to be inside the walls.

As for Cornelius: he was chosen bishop of Rome by the judgment of God, by the testimony of the clergy, by the vote of the people present, and by the consent of aged priests and good men — when no one else had been chosen before him, when the position of Fabian was vacant after his martyrdom. He did not seize the office by force. He was a man who advanced through every grade of the church, step by step. He did not vault to the summit. He earned it.

Novatian, by contrast — what is he? He was not even properly ordained. No one asked for him. He invented his own claim. He calls himself a bishop of bishops. He set up an alternative altar, an alternative priesthood, and a rival church. And the core of his teaching is mercilessness: he has sealed the door of the Church shut against the lapsed and declared that there is no hope, no penance, no path back. Even those who knock with tears and groaning are turned away.

This is not rigor — it is cruelty. This is not discipline — it is despair. God himself, who made repentance possible, does not close the door on the penitent.

[Context: Novatian was a Roman presbyter who, after the election of Cornelius as Bishop of Rome in 251 AD, had himself consecrated as a rival bishop. His party took the hardline position that Christians who had lapsed under persecution could never be readmitted to communion. Cyprian opposed this extreme view while also insisting on proper penance before reconciliation.]

Modern English rendering for readability. See the 19th-century translation or original Latin/Greek for scholarly use.

Related Letters