Letter 109: Riparius, a presbyter of Aquitaine had written to inform Jerome that Vigilantius (for whom see Letter LXI.) was preaching in southern Gaul against the worship of relics and the keeping of night vigils; and this apparently with the consent of his bishop. Jerome now replies in a letter more noteworthy for its bitterness than for its logic. Neverth...

JeromeRiparius|c. 406 AD|jerome
barbarian invasiongrief deathhumorillnessimperial politicsproperty economicsslavery captivitywomen
Barbarian peoples/invasions; Persecution or exile; Travel & mobility

Jerome to Riparius — greetings.

Your letter puts me in an impossible position: if I ignore it, I am guilty of arrogance; if I respond to it, I risk saying things that will scandalize the pious. You tell me that Vigilantius — whose very name, "Wakeful One," is a standing joke, since Sleepy would suit him better — has opened his foul mouth again and is pouring a torrent of filth onto the relics of the holy martyrs. He calls those of us who honor them "ash-worshippers" and "idolaters who bow down to dead men's bones." Poor wretch. He deserves the tears of every Christian. In speaking this way, he aligns himself with the Samaritans and the Jews, who regard a corpse as defiling and treat any vessel that has been in the same room as a dead body as ritually unclean. He follows the letter that kills and ignores the spirit that gives life (2 Corinthians 3:6).

Let me be precise about what we actually do, since Vigilantius appears genuinely confused. We do not worship the relics of martyrs. We do not even worship the sun and moon, the angels and archangels, the cherubim and seraphim, or any name that is named in this age or the age to come (Ephesians 1:21). We may not serve the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever (Romans 1:25). But we do honor the relics of the martyrs — precisely because honoring a martyr's remains is honoring the temple of the Holy Spirit (1 Corinthians 6:19). The same Spirit who will raise those very bones at the last day.

What Vigilantius objects to, in the end, is the resurrection. He cannot accept that the body matters — that what was holy in life remains holy in death, that dust and bone can be sacred. This is not a trivial liturgical squabble. It is a denial of the Incarnation itself.

If you can lay hands on his book — the one in which he has set down all his heresies in writing — send it to me. I will write the full refutation that this absurdity deserves. Until then, continue to do what you are already doing: hold firm, oppose him publicly, and refuse to be silenced by the pathetic spectacle of a heretic claiming that orthodoxy is the intolerant position.

Modern English rendering for readability. See the 19th-century translation or original Latin/Greek for scholarly use.

Related Letters