Letter 72: Vitalis had asked Jerome Is Scripture credible when it tells us that Solomon and Ahaz became fathers at the age of eleven? The difficulty had previously occurred to Jerome himself (Letter XXXVI. 10, whence perhaps Vitalis took it) and in this letter he suggests several ways in which it may be met.
Letter 72: To Vitalis, On Young Fathers in Scripture (398 AD)
[Vitalis had asked Jerome a question that sounds whimsical but actually touches on biblical chronology: does Scripture really claim that Solomon and Ahaz became fathers at the age of eleven? Jerome had flagged this problem himself years earlier (in Letter 36) and now offers several possible solutions. He is perfectly prepared, if necessary, to accept the claim at face value: "There are many things in Scripture that sound incredible and yet are true, for nature cannot resist the Lord of nature." But he is also inclined to think the question trivial, not worth losing sleep over. The tone is characteristic: simultaneously learned and dismissive.]
Human translation — New Advent (NPNF / ANF series)
Related Letters
Ad Vitalem episcopum Ravennensem
Felix, bishop of Rome, to Vitalis, bishop, and Misenus, bishop, our legates to Constantinople, greetings.
What we have learned about our brother the bishop Januarius the bearers of these presents, as well as the copies of our letters, will sufficiently inform you; and so let your Experience judiciously carry into effect the excommunication which we have decreed to be pronounced on his perverse counsellors, that they may learn by falling not to walk ...
Seeing, then, that he is so situated that he cannot be fit to order anything, warn the steward of that Church, and Epiphanius the archpresbyter, under our strict authority, that they themselves at their own peril endeavour themselves carefully and profitably to set those same hospitals (xenodochia) in order. For, if there should be any neglect t...
You are doing something like a man with an incurable disease who, having been given freedom to do whatever he...