Letter 44: Leo, the bishop, and the holy Synod which is assembled at Rome to Theodosius Augustus. I. He exposes the unscrupulous nature of the proceedings at Ephesus.

Pope Leo the GreatTheodosius Augustus|c. 445 AD|leo great
christologyhumorillnessimperial politicspapal authority
Theological controversy; Imperial politics; Church council

Leo, Bishop of Rome, and the holy synod assembled at Rome: to Theodosius Augustus.

I. He exposes the unscrupulous nature of the proceedings at Ephesus

From your clemency's letter, written out of love for the Catholic faith and addressed some time ago to the see of the blessed Apostle Peter, we drew such confidence in your defense of truth and peace that we believed nothing harmful could result from so clear and well-ordered a matter. This was especially so because those we sent to the episcopal council that you ordered held at Ephesus were thoroughly instructed. If the Bishop of Alexandria had allowed the letters they carried -- whether addressed to the holy synod or to Bishop Flavian -- to be read in the hearing of the assembled bishops, the declaration of the most pure faith which we have both received and hold, being divinely inspired, would have silenced all dispute so completely that neither ignorance could have displayed itself further nor jealousy found an opportunity to do mischief.

But because private interests were served under the cover of religion, the disloyalty of a few has inflicted a wound upon the entire Church. For not from any unreliable source, but from a most faithful witness to the events -- our deacon Hilarus, who barely managed to escape so that he would not be compelled by force to sign their proceedings -- we have learned what took place. A great many bishops assembled at the synod, and their numbers would certainly have aided the debate and decision if the one who claimed the chief place had been willing to maintain priestly moderation, allowing all to express their opinions freely and then, after calm and fair deliberation, reaching a conclusion both agreeable to the faith and helpful to those in error.

But we are told that not all who attended were admitted to the actual decision. Some were excluded; others, at Bishop Dioscorus's demand, surrendered themselves to an unrighteous subscription, knowing they would suffer harm if they refused. The resolution he forced through was of such a nature that by attacking one man he vented his fury on the entire Church. Our delegates from the Apostolic See found this so blasphemous and contrary to the Catholic faith that no pressure could induce them to assent. In that very synod they protested vigorously that the Apostolic See could never accept what was being done.

II. He asks the Emperor to convene a new council

We therefore beseech your clemency, for the sake of your own faith and for the peace of the entire Catholic world, to order a new general council to be held in Italy, so that all the judgments which were either extorted by fear or obtained by intrigue at Ephesus may be reviewed and, where necessary, reversed. This is the only remedy that will satisfy the injured faith and restore peace to the troubled churches. For what was perpetrated there was not a judgment but a crime, and a crime so audacious that the very foundations of the Christian faith were shaken by it.

We urge you, most pious emperor, not to allow the proceedings of one unlawful assembly to stand as the sentence of the whole Church. The Catholic faith, which your illustrious predecessors defended with all their strength, calls upon you now for the same protection. It is your glory to be the defender of divine truth, and we are confident that the same Spirit who guards your empire will guide you in this matter.

Dated at Rome.

Modern English rendering for readability. See the 19th-century translation or original Latin/Greek for scholarly use.

Related Letters