Letter 21

Hilary of RomeUnknown|pope hilary
From: The bishops of Tarraconensis
To: Pope Hilary, bishop of Rome
Date: ~465 AD
Context: Pope Hilary's letter 14; the Tarraconensian bishops write again on the case of Irenaeus, who had been named as a successor bishop by the dying Nundinarius of Barcelona.

The bishops of Tarraconensis to the most holy Pope Hilary, a second letter.

We write again on the matter of Irenaeus, whom Nundinarius, the late bishop of Barcelona, had designated as his successor, and who is being supported in his claim by the clergy and people who favored that designation.

The canonical question is clear: a sitting bishop does not have the authority to designate his own successor. The choice of a bishop belongs to the clergy and people of the diocese, supervised by the metropolitan. Whatever Nundinarius's intentions were — and we do not question that he acted from genuine pastoral concern — his designation cannot override the canonical process.

At the same time, the clergy and people who are supporting Irenaeus's claim are not simply seeking to impose a bishop against the community's wishes; they represent a significant part of the community's own wishes. The situation is therefore more complicated than a simple violation of procedure.

We ask for guidance on how to handle the specific case, taking account of both the canonical problem and the pastoral reality.

The bishops of Tarraconensis

Modern English rendering for readability. See the 19th-century translation or original Latin/Greek for scholarly use.