From: The bishops of Tarraconensis
To: Pope Hilary, bishop of Rome
Date: ~465 AD
Context: Pope Hilary's letter 14; the Tarraconensian bishops write again on the case of Irenaeus, who had been named as a successor bishop by the dying Nundinarius of Barcelona.
The bishops of Tarraconensis to the most holy Pope Hilary, a second letter.
We write again on the matter of Irenaeus, whom Nundinarius, the late bishop of Barcelona, had designated as his successor, and who is being supported in his claim by the clergy and people who favored that designation.
The canonical question is clear: a sitting bishop does not have the authority to designate his own successor. The choice of a bishop belongs to the clergy and people of the diocese, supervised by the metropolitan. Whatever Nundinarius's intentions were — and we do not question that he acted from genuine pastoral concern — his designation cannot override the canonical process.
At the same time, the clergy and people who are supporting Irenaeus's claim are not simply seeking to impose a bishop against the community's wishes; they represent a significant part of the community's own wishes. The situation is therefore more complicated than a simple violation of procedure.
We ask for guidance on how to handle the specific case, taking account of both the canonical problem and the pastoral reality.
The bishops of Tarraconensis
Eplscoporum Tarraconensium ad Uilarum papam. ^6M
l3l d HUaruM Irenaeum episcopum, quem Nundinarius sihi successorem optavit
queMtqite eiemi et poputus expetunt^ in Barcinonensi sede confirmet. De Silvani
moHiionibuM iierato conqueruntur, quum nullum ad priores litteras responsum
aceepissent,
\ Beatissimo et apostolica reyerentia a nobis in
' ' Christo colendo papae Hilaro Ascanius et uni-
yersi episcopi Tarraconensis proyinciae.
1. Quam^) curam apostolatus vester de provinciarum suarum
sacerdotibus gerat^ filio nostro illustri Vincentio duce provinciae no-
strae referente cognovimus: cujus impulsu votum nostrum in ausum
.scribendi prona devotione surrexit. Ergo provineiali litterario ser-
mone debita coronae^) vestxae obsequia deferentes^ his quaesimiuS;
i ot dignatione^ qua ceteros^ etiam humilitatem nostram in orationibus
Testris in mente habere dignemini; beatissime et apostolica reveren-
I tia iu Christo a nobis colende pater: illud sp^cialius deprecantes; ut
factom nostrum^ quod tam voto pene onmis provinciae quam exemplo
Tetostatis in notitiam') vestram defertur^ perpensis assertionibus no-
ttris roborare dignemini.
2. Episcopus Barcinonensium^) civitatis sanctus Nundinarius
sortem explevit conditionis humanae. Hic episcopo venerabili fratri
**) Plnres maB. (etiam F* H' H^) obtinere catholica audeat ecclesia (ct pauUo
aotea H* quod a s. Peirf), mendose.
■) aliquot mas, Quoniam euram. Deinde F* apostolatus veslri et postcriori
mana additam provideniia. Moxque cum F' H' H^ h' rcvocamus duce, quod in
aliis deest.
•; Variant in hac voce codices. Alii leg^nt Farohiensium , Varohiensium (F«
H*), VarrokienMium (H'), Faroiensium, alii Vertenonensium , Vercenonensium , alii
Bartinon^nMium et Barcilonensium. Mox H' Hierineo.
:i. 464nostro Irenaeo, qiiem ipse autea in dioecesi^) sua nobis volentibas
"" * constituerat, derelinquens ei quod potuit habere paupertas^ supremae
voluntatis arbitrio in locum sumn ut substitueretur optavit: sed de-
functi judicium in ejus meritimi non vacillat. Siquidem omnis cle-
nis et plebs ejiLsdem civitatis et optimi et pliuimi provinciales, vt ^
idem in®) ejiis locimi observaret, a nobis speraverunt dato consenso.
Noa cogitantes defuncti judicimn, et probantes ejus vitam et eomm =
nobilitatem atcjue multitudinem qui petebant, simul et utilitatem
ecclesiae memoratae, optimum duximus, ut tanto sacerdoti, qui ad
divina migraverat, non minoris meriti substitueretur antistes, prae-
sertim quum ecclesia illius municipii, in qua ante fuerat ordinataS|
semper hujus civitatis ecclesiae fuisse dioecesis constet. Ergo sup-
pliciter precamur apostolatum vestrum, ut humilitatis nostrae^) quod
juste a nobis videtur factum vestra auctoritate firmetis.
3. Jamdudum sane questi fueramus litteris nostris de praesnm-
ptione Silvani episcopi, et miramur, quod nulla^) apostolatus vestri
responsa suscepimus. Nimc liaec eadem suggerentes petimus, ut
quid super his rebus observandum sit, apostolicis sermonibns not
dignemini informare. £t ne forsitan per negligentiam portitorit
aut per longinqui itineris difficidtatem humilitatis nostrae ad tob
scripta non potuerint ex hoc negotio pervenire, etiam suggestionem -
nostram maluinms iterare. £t subscriptio : Orantem pro nobis san-
ctum apostolatum vestrum jugi aevo divina conservet aetemitas no-
bis onmibus et Ecclesiae suae, domine vere noster et*) aposto-;
lice papa! *
Fussalensi ad paroeciam Hipponensis ecclesiae pertinentc instituiBso, idem et
Nuudiuario in quodam ditiouis suae municipio cum episcoporum provinciae
sensu factum videtur.
^ Ita h* et mss. Editi addimt decretum. Et id quidem hic praeBolea repe*'
tuut, quod initio postularant, ut Hilarus factum non decrctum ipsorum (i
nostrae) roborarc dignetur.
®) F* nuUatenus vestra responsa. Moxque H' lonyi itineris faeuUatem,
EPISTOLAE 14. 15. 159
◆
From:The bishops of Tarraconensis
To:Pope Hilary, bishop of Rome
Date:~465 AD
Context:Pope Hilary's letter 14; the Tarraconensian bishops write again on the case of Irenaeus, who had been named as a successor bishop by the dying Nundinarius of Barcelona.
The bishops of Tarraconensis to the most holy Pope Hilary, a second letter.
We write again on the matter of Irenaeus, whom Nundinarius, the late bishop of Barcelona, had designated as his successor, and who is being supported in his claim by the clergy and people who favored that designation.
The canonical question is clear: a sitting bishop does not have the authority to designate his own successor. The choice of a bishop belongs to the clergy and people of the diocese, supervised by the metropolitan. Whatever Nundinarius's intentions were — and we do not question that he acted from genuine pastoral concern — his designation cannot override the canonical process.
At the same time, the clergy and people who are supporting Irenaeus's claim are not simply seeking to impose a bishop against the community's wishes; they represent a significant part of the community's own wishes. The situation is therefore more complicated than a simple violation of procedure.
We ask for guidance on how to handle the specific case, taking account of both the canonical problem and the pastoral reality.
The bishops of Tarraconensis
Modern English rendering for readability. See the 19th-century translation or original Latin/Greek for scholarly use.