Letter 158: 1. I urgently beg you to send the reply due to my last letter. Indeed, I would have preferred first to learn what I then asked, and afterwards to put the questions which I now submit to you.

From Evodius, Bishop, to Bishop Augustine. The praiseworthy character and blessed death of a certain young man. 1. A young man of our congregation died recently, and his death was remarkable for its holiness. In his final illness he displayed such patience, such joy, such confidence in the promises of Christ, that those of us at his bedside were more comforted than comforting. He spoke of the world to come as if he could see it — and perhaps he could. 2. But what happened after his death disturbed me. His mother reported that he appeared to her in a dream, alive and radiant, and spoke to her about his state. Other members of the household reported similar visions. Are these real communications from the dead, or are they products of the dreaming mind? 3. I have collected several such accounts. A devout woman in our city saw her deceased husband in a vision, and he told her where to find a document she needed. She found it exactly where he said it would be. Another person was warned in a dream by a dead friend about a danger he was about to face. He heeded the warning and was saved. 4. This raises a profound question for me: when the soul is released from the body by death, does it retain some kind of subtle body — something more refined than our physical flesh but still corporeal — by which it can move from place to place and appear to the living? 5. Or do the dead not actually come to us at all? Perhaps angels take their forms and deliver messages on their behalf? Or perhaps God himself plants these images in our minds while we sleep, using the memories of the dead as his instrument? 6. I confess I do not know the answer. But I know that you have thought about these things more deeply than I have, and I beg you to share whatever light you have found. 7. A further question: if the soul after death has no body at all — not even a subtle one — how can it experience place? How can it be "in Abraham's bosom" or in any location at all? Can something entirely incorporeal be anywhere? 8. There are more reports I could share — visions of the dead appearing not only in dreams but, some claim, in waking life. I hesitate to recount them all, lest I seem credulous. But I know you will judge these things more wisely than I can. 9. Other visions too have been reported to me — some terrifying, some consoling — by people whose sincerity I have no reason to doubt. 10. I also wish to ask you about certain passages in Scripture that bear on these questions — particularly the appearance of Samuel to Saul through the witch of Endor. Was that really Samuel, or a demonic impersonation? 11. Finally, teach me this: by what varied manner does God make himself known to human beings and to angels? I know I am asking much, but the importance of these questions justifies the length of the letter. I await your response as eagerly as a thirsty man awaits water.

Letter 158 (A.D. 414) To My Lord Augustine, My Brother Partner in the Sacerdotal Office, Most Sincerely Loved, with Profound Respect, and to the Brethren Who are with Him, Evodius and the Brethren Who are with Him Send Greeting in the Lord. 1. I urgently beg you to send the reply due to my last letter. Indeed, I would have preferred first to learn what I then asked, and afterwards to put the questions which I now submit to you. Give me your attention while I relate an event in which you will kindly take an interest, and which has made me impatient to lose no time in acquiring, if possible in this life, the knowledge which I desired. I had a certain youth as a clerk, a son of presbyter Armenus of Melonita, whom, by my humble instrumentality, God rescued when he was becoming already immersed in secular affairs, for he was employed as a shorthand writer by the proconsul's solicitor. He was then, indeed, as boys usually are, prompt and somewhat restless, but as he grew older (for his death occurred in his twenty-second year) a gravity of deportment and circumspect probity of life so adorned him that it is a pleasure to dwell upon his memory. He was, moreover, a clever stenographer, and indefatigable in writing: he had begun also to be earnest in reading, so that he even urged me to do more than my indolence would have chosen, in order to spend hours of the night in reading, for he read aloud to me for a time every night after all was still; and in reading, he would not pass over any sentence unless he understood it, and would go over it a third or even a fourth time, and not leave it until what he wished to know was made clear. I had begun to regard him not as a mere boy and clerk, but as a comparatively intimate and pleasant friend, for his conversation gave me much delight. 2. He desired also to depart and to be with Christ, a desire which has been fulfilled. For he was ill for sixteen days in his father's house, and by strength of memory he continually repeated portions of Scripture throughout almost the whole time of his illness. But when he was very near to the end of his life, he sang so as to be heard by all, My soul longs for and hastens unto the courts of the Lord, after which he sang again, You have anointed my head with oil, and beautiful is Your cup, overpowering my senses with delight! In these things he was wholly occupied; in the consolation yielded by them he found satisfaction. At the last, when dissolution was just coming upon him, he began to make the sign of the cross on his forehead, and in finishing this his hand was moving down to his mouth, which also he wished to mark with the same sign, but the inward man (which had been truly renewed day by day) 2 Corinthians 4:16 had, ere this was done, forsaken the tabernacle of clay. To myself there has been given so great an ecstasy of joy, that I think that after leaving his own body he has entered into my spirit, and is there imparting to me a certain fullness of light from his presence, for I am conscious of a joy beyond all measure through his deliverance and safety — indeed it is ineffable. For I felt no small anxiety on his account, being afraid of the dangers peculiar to his years. For I was at pains to inquire of himself whether perchance he had been defiled by intercourse with woman; he solemnly assured us that he was free from this stain, by which declaration our joy was still more increased. So he died. We honored his memory by suitable obsequies, such as were due to one so excellent, for we continued during three days to praise the Lord with hymns at his grave, and on the third day we offered the sacraments of redemption. 3. Behold, however, two days thereafter, a certain respectable widow from Figentes, an handmaid from God, who said that she had been twelve years in widowhood, saw the following vision in a dream. She saw a certain deacon, who had died four years ago, preparing a palace, with the assistance of servants and handmaids of God (virgins and widows). It was being so much adorned that the place was refulgent with splendor, and appeared to be wholly made of silver. On her inquiring eagerly for whom this palace was being prepared, the deacon aforesaid answered, For the young man, the son of the presbyter, who was cut off yesterday. There appeared in the same palace an old man robed in white, who gave orders to two others, also dressed in white, to go, and having raised the body from the grave, to carry it up with them to heaven. And she added, that so soon as the body had been taken up from the grave and carried to heaven, there sprang from the same sepulchre branches of the rose, called from its folded blossoms the virgin rose. 4. I have narrated the event: listen now, if you please, to my question, and teach me what I ask, for the departure of that young man's soul forces such questions from me. While we are in the body, we have an inward faculty of perception which is alert in proportion to the activity of our attention, and is more wakeful and eager the more earnestly attentive we become: and it seems to us probable that even in its highest activity it is retarded by the encumbrance of the body, for who can fully describe all that the mind suffers through the body! In the midst of the perturbation and annoyance which come from the suggestions, temptations, necessities, and varied afflictions of which the body is the cause, the mind does not surrender its strength, it resists and conquers. Sometimes it is defeated; nevertheless, mindful of what is its own nature, it becomes, under the stimulating influence of such labours, more active and more wary, and breaks through the meshes of wickedness, and so makes its way to better things. Your Holiness will kindly understand what I mean to say. Therefore, while we are in this life, we are hindered by such deficiencies, and are nevertheless, as it is written, more than conquerors through Him that loved us. Romans 8:37 When we go forth from this body, and escape from every burden, and from sin, with its incessant activity, what are we? 5. In the first place, I ask whether there may not be some kind of body (formed, perchance, of one of the four elements, either air or ether) which does not depart from the incorporeal principle, that is, the substance properly called the soul, when it forsakes this earthly body. For as the soul is in its nature incorporeal, if it be absolutely disembodied by death there is now one soul of all that have left this world. And in that case where would the rich man, who was clothed in purple, and Lazarus, who was full of sores, now be? How, moreover, could they be distinguished according to their respective deserts, so that the one should have suffering and the other have joy, if there were only a single soul made by the combination of all disembodied souls, unless, of course, these things are to be understood in a figurative sense? Be that as it may, there is no question that souls which are held in definite places (as that rich man was in the flame, and that poor man was in Abraham's bosom) are held in bodies. If there are distinct places, there are bodies, and in these bodies the souls reside; and even although the punishments and rewards are experienced in the conscience, the soul which experiences them is nevertheless in a body. Whatever is the nature of that one soul made up of many souls, it must be possible for it in its unbroken unity to be both grieved and made glad at the same moment, if it is to approve itself to be really a substance consisting of many souls gathered into one. If, however, this soul is called one only in the same way as the incorporeal mind is called one, although it has in it memory, and will, and intellect, and if it be alleged that all these are separate incorporeal causes or powers and have their several distinctive offices and work without one impeding another in any way, I think this might be in some measure answered by saying that it must be also possible for some of the souls to be under punishment and some of the sours to enjoy rewards simultaneously in this one substance consisting of many souls gathered into One. 6. Or if this be not so [that is, if there be no such body remaining still in union with the incorporeal principle after it quits this earthly body], what is there to hinder each soul from having, when separated from the solid body which it here inhabits, another body, so that the soul always animates a body of some kind? Or in what body does it pass to any region, if such there be, to which necessity compels it to go? For the angels themselves, if they were not numbered by bodies of some kind which they have, could not be called many, as they are by the Truth Himself when He said in the gospel, I could pray the Father, and He will presently give me twelve legions of angels. Matthew 26:53 Again it is certain that Samuel was seen in the body when he was raised at the request of Saul; 1 Samuel 28:14 and as to Moses, whose body was buried, it is plain from the gospel narrative that he came in the body to the Lord on the mountain to which He and His disciples had retired. Matthew 17:3 In the Apocrypha, and in the Mysteries of Moses, a writing which is wholly devoid of authority, it is indeed said that, at the time when he ascended the mount to die, through the power which his body possessed, there was one body which was committed to the earth, and another which was joined to the angel who accompanied him; but I do not feel myself called upon to give to a sentence in apocryphal writings a preference over the definite statements quoted above. We must therefore give attention to this, and search out, by the help either of the authority of revelation or of the light of reason, the matter about which we are inquiring. But it is alleged that the future resurrection of the body is a proof that the soul was after death absolutely without a body. This is not, however, an unanswerable objection, for the angels, who are like our souls invisible, have at times desired to appear in bodily forms and be seen, and (whatever might be the form of body worthy to be assumed by these spirits) they have appeared, for example, to Abraham Genesis 18:6 and to Tobias. Tobit 12:16 Therefore it is quite possible that the resurrection of the body may, as we assuredly believe, take place, and yet that the soul may be reunited to it without its being found to have been at any moment wholly devoid of some kind of body. Now the body which the soul here occupies consists of the four elements, of which one, namely heat, seems to depart from this body at the same moment as the soul. For there remains after death that which is made of earth, moisture also is not wanting to the body, nor is the element of cold matter gone; heat alone has fled, which perhaps the soul takes along with it if it migrates from place to place. This is all that I say meanwhile concerning the body. 7. It seems to me also, that if the soul while occupying the living body is capable, as I have said, of strenuous mental application, how much more unencumbered, active, vigorous, earnest, resolute, and persevering will it be, how much enlarged in capacity and improved in character, if it has while in this body learned to relish virtue! For after laying aside this body, or rather, after having this cloud swept away, the soul will have come to be free from all disturbing influences, enjoying tranquillity and exempt from temptation, seeing whatever it has longed for, and embracing what it has loved. Then, also, it will be capable of remembering and recognising friends, both those who went before it from this world, and those whom it left here below. Perhaps this may be true. I know not, but I desire to learn. But it would greatly distress me to think that the soul after death passes into a state of torpor, being as it were buried, just as it is during sleep while it is in the body, living only in hope, but having nothing and knowing nothing, especially if in its sleep it be not even stirred by any dreams. This notion causes me very great horror, and seems to indicate that the life of the soul is extinguished at death. 8. This also I would ask: Supposing that the soul be discovered to have such a body as we speak of, does that body lack any of the senses? Of course, if there cannot be imposed upon it any necessity for smelling, tasting, or touching, as I suppose will be the case, these senses will be wanting; but I hesitate as to the senses of sight and hearing. For are not devils said to hear (not, indeed, in all the persons whom they harass, for in regard to these there is a question), even when they appear in bodies of their own? And as to the faculty of sight, how can they pass from one place to another if they have a body but are void of the power of seeing, so as to guide its motions? Do you think that this is not the case with human souls when they go forth from the body — that they have still a body of some kind, and are not deprived of some at least of the senses proper to this body? Else how can we explain the fact that very many dead persons have been observed by day, or by persons awake and walking abroad during the night, to pass into houses just as they were wont to do in their lifetime? This I have heard not once, but often; and I have also heard it said that in places in which dead bodies are interred, and especially in churches, there are commotions and prayers which are heard for the most part at a certain time of the night. This I remember hearing from more than one: for a certain holy presbyter was an eye-witness of such an apparition, having observed a multitude of such phantoms issuing from the baptistery in bodies full of light, after which he heard their prayers in the midst of the church itself. All such things are either true, and therefore helpful to the inquiry which we are now making, or are mere fables, in which case the fact of their invention is wonderful; nevertheless I would desire to get some information from the fact that they come and visit men, and are seen otherwise than in dreams. 9. These dreams suggest another question. I do not at this moment concern myself about the mere creations of fancy, which are formed by the emotions of the uneducated. I speak of visitations in sleep, such as the apparition to Joseph Matthew 1:20 in a dream, in the manner experienced in most cases of the kind. In the same manner, therefore, our own friends also who have departed this life before us sometimes come and appear to us in dreams, and speak to us. For I myself remember that Profuturus, and Privatus, and Servilius, holy men who within my recollection were removed by death from our monastery, spoke to me, and that the events of which they spoke came to pass according to their words. Or if it be some other higher spirit that assumes their form and visits our minds, I leave this to the all-seeing eye of Him before whom everything from the highest to the lowest is uncovered. If, therefore, the Lord be pleased to speak through reason to your Holiness on all these questions, I beg you to be so kind as make me partaker of the knowledge which you have received. There is another thing which I have resolved not to omit mentioning, for perhaps it bears upon the matter now under investigation: 10. This same youth, in connection with whom these questions are brought forward, departed this life after having received what may be called a summons at the time when he was dying. For one who had been a companion of his as a student, and reader, and shorthand writer to my dictation, who had died eight months before, was seen by a person in a dream coming towards him. When he was asked by the person who then distinctly saw him why he had come, he said, I have come to take this friend away; and so it proved. For in the house itself, also, there appeared to a certain old man, who was almost awake, a man bearing in his hand a laurel branch on which something was written. Nay, more, when this one was seen, it is further reported that after the death of the young man, his father the presbyter had begun to reside along with the aged Theasius in the monastery, in order to find consolation there, but lo! On the third day after his death, the young man is seen entering the monastery, and is asked by one of the brethren in a dream of some kind whether he knew himself to be dead. He replied that he knew he was. The other asked whether he had been welcomed by God. This also he answered with great expressions of joy. And when questioned as to the reason why he had come, he answered, I have been sent to summon my father. The person to whom these things were shown awakes, and relates what had passed. It comes to the ear of Bishop Theasius. He, being alarmed, sharply admonished the person who told him, lest the matter should come, as it might easily do, to the ear of the presbyter himself, and he should be disturbed by such tidings. But why prolong the narration? Within about four days from this visitation he was saying (for he had suffered from a moderate feverishness) that he was now out of danger, and that the physician had given up attending him, having assured him that there was no cause whatever for anxiety; but that very day this presbyter expired after he had lain down on his couch. Nor should I forbear mentioning, that on the same day on which the youth died, he asked his father three times to forgive him anything in which he might have offended, and every time that he kissed his father he said to him, Let us give thanks to God, father, and insisted upon his father saying the words along with him, as if he were exhorting one who was to be his companion in going forth from this world. And in fact only seven days elapsed between the two deaths. What shall we say of things so wonderful? Who shall be a thoroughly reliable teacher as to these mysterious dispensations? To you in the hour of perplexity my agitated heart unburdens itself. The divine appointment of the death of the young man and of his father is beyond all doubt, for two sparrows shall not fall to the ground without the will of our heavenly Father. Matthew 10:29 11. That the soul cannot exist in absolute separation from a body of some kind is proved in my opinion by the fact that to exist without body belongs to God alone. But I think that the laying aside of so great a burden as the body, in the act of passing from this world, proves that the soul will then be very much more wakeful than it is meanwhile; for then the soul appears, as I think, far more noble when no longer encumbered by so great a hindrance, both in action and in knowledge, and that entire spiritual rest proves it to be free from all causes of disturbance and error, but does not make it languid, and as it were slow, torpid, and embarrassed, inasmuch as it is enough for the soul to enjoy in its fullness the liberty to which it has attained in being freed from the world and the body; for, as you have wisely said, the intellect is satisfied with food, and applies the lips of the spirit to the fountain of life in that condition in which it is happy and blessed in the undisputed lordship of its own faculties. For before I quitted the monastery I saw brother Servilius in a dream after his decease, and he said that we were labouring to attain by the exercise of reason to an understanding of truth, whereas he and those who were in the same state as he were always resting in the pure joy of contemplation. 12. I also beg you to explain to me in how many ways the word wisdom is used; as God is wisdom, and a wise mind is wisdom (in which way it is said to be as light); as we read also of the wisdom of Bezaleel, who made the tabernacle or the ointment, and the wisdom of Solomon, or any other wisdom, if there be such, and wherein they differ from each other; and whether the one eternal Wisdom which is with the Father is to be understood as spoken of in these different degrees, as they are called diverse gifts of the Holy Spirit, who divides to every one severally according as He will. Or, with the exception of that Wisdom alone which was not created, were these created, and have they a distinct existence of their own? Or are they effects, and have they received their name from the definition of their work? I am asking a great many questions. May the Lord grant you grace to discover the truth sought, and wisdom sufficient to commit it to writing, and to communicate it without delay to me. I have written in much ignorance, and in a homely style; but since you think it worth while to know that about which I am inquiring, I beseech you in the name of Christ the Lord to correct me where I am mistaken, and teach me what you know that I am desirous to learn.

EPISTOLA 158 Scripta a. 414 aut 415. Evodius, Uzalensis episcopus, laudabiles mores ac felicem iuvenis cuiusdam obitum prosecutus (nn. 1-2) eiusque et aliorum defunctorum narratis apparitionibus (nn. 3 et 10; nn. 8-9), inquirit utrum anima per mortem soluta non omni careat corpore, quo de loco in locum ferri possit (nn. 4-7 et n. 11). Edoceri demum cupit qua varia ratione de Deo et hominibus dicatur sapientia (n. 12). DOMINO VENERABILITERQUE DILECTISSIMO FRATRI ET CONSACERDOTI AUGUSTINO, ET FRATRIBUS QUI TECUM SUNT, EVODIUS, ET FRATRES QUI MECUM SUNT, IN DOMINO SALUTEM. Optimus iuvenis quidam, Evodii notarius. 1. Debitum flagito epistolae quam misi; et volui primo illud discere quod interrogavi, et postea hoc requirere. Audi rem, quia dignaris, quae me fecit impatientem, ut et id festinarem nosse, si fieri potest, in hac vita. Quemdam puerum habui presbyteri Armeni Melonitani filium notarium: hunc iam saeculo se mergentem, nam scholastico proconsulis excipiebat, per meam eruit Deus humilitatem. Fuit quidem, ut puerilis aetas habet, promptus, aliquantulum inquietus, et accedente aetate (nam vigesimo et secundo anno solvitur), ita eum gravitas morum, et custos bona vita ornavit, ut satis delectet eius habere memoriam. Erat autem strenuus in notis, et in scribendo bene laboriosus, studiosus quoque esse coeperat lectionis, ut ipse meam tarditatem causa legendi nocturnis horis exhortaretur; nam aliquanto tempore noctis mihi ipse legebat, cum omnia siluissent: nec volebat praeterire lectionem, nisi intellexisset, et tertio et quarto repetebat, et nec dimittebat, nisi sibi apparuisset quod quaerebat. Coeperam eum non quasi puerum et notarium habere, sed amicum quemdam satis necessarium et suavem. Delectabant enim me fabulae ipsius. Optimi illius iuvenis mors piissima. 2. Optabat quoque, quod ei praestitum est, dissolvi et esse cum Christo 1. Nam aegrotavit sexdecim diebus apud parentes suos, et memoriae vi de Scripturis pene tota aegritudine loquebatur. Sed ut ad finem vitae proximus esse coepit, psallebat audientibus omnibus: Desiderat et properat anima mea ad atria Dei 2; et post haec iterum psallebat: Impinguasti in oleo caput meum; et poculum tuum inebrians quam praeclarum est! 3 Ibi fuit occupatus; hac se oblectabat consolatione. Deinde cum solvi coepisset, signare se coepit in fronte, ita ut sic descenderet manus ad os quod sibi cupiebat signare, cum iam interior homo, et bene renovatus de die in diem, domum luteam dimisisset. Mihi tantum gaudium accrevit, ut arbitrer quod dimisso proprio corpore in meum animum ingressus sit, et ibi mihi quamdam luciditatem praesentiae suae praestet, quia liberatione et securitate illius nimis gaudeo; dici non potest. Non enim levem ei exhibui sollicitudinem, timens aetati adolescentis. Nam curavi ex eo quaerere, ne forte feminae contagione fuisset pollutus: liberum se esse testatus est, magis ut nostrum gaudium cumularetur. Solutus est ergo. Exsequias praebuimus satis honorabiles, et dignas tantae animae; nam per triduum hymnis Dominum collaudavimus super sepulcrum ipsius, et redemptionis Sacramenta tertio die obtulimus. Iuvenem illum viduae cuidam apparuisse. 3. Sed ecce post biduum quaedam vidua honesta Urbica de Figentibus, quae duodecim se annos viduam dicebat, ancilla Dei, somnium vidit tale. Videt quemdam diaconum ante quadriennium corpore exutum, cum servis et ancillis Dei virginibus et viduis palatium praeparare. Ornabatur autem, ut claritas loci fulsisset, et locus omnis argenteus putaretur. Cum illa studiosius interrogasset cuinam hoc praepararetur; respondit ille diaconus, puero qui hesterno consumptus est, filio presbyteri praeparari. Et in eodem palatio quemdam senem candidatum apparuisse, qui iuberet duobus candidatis ut pergerent, et corpus ablatum de sepulcro ad coelum levarent. Cumque, inquit, de sepulcro corpus fuisset assumptum atque in coelum levatum, ramos rosarum virginum (sic enim clausae appellari solent) de eodem sepulcro surrexisse. Quid post mortem futuri simus. 4. Narravi quid fuerit gestum. Modo quaestionem audire dignare, et doce quod quaero. Cogit enim me istius animae migratio talia percunctari. Cum in corpore sumus, est nobis sensus interior solers pro agilitate studii nostri; et tanto vigilantior et ferventior, quanto fuerimus studiosiores, et adhuc impedimento corporis retardari nos videtur esse probabile. Quis autem omnia quae animus ex corpore patitur, poterit enarrare? Inter has turbas et molestias, ex suggestionibus, ex tentationibus, ex necessitatibus, diversisque calamitatibus venientes, fortitudinem suam non deserit animus: resistit, vincit; aliquando vincitur. Tamen quoniam meminit sui, agilior et sollicitior efficitur excitatus tantis laboribus, et rumpit quosque nodos malitiae, et transit ad meliora. Quid dicam dignatur intellegere Sanctitas tua. Ergo cum in hac vita sumus, talibus egestatibus impedimur, et tamen, sicut scriptum est: supervincimus per eum qui dilexit nos 4. Exeuntes de corpore, et onus omne, et agile peccatum evadentes, qui sumus? Utrum post mortem anima sit corporis expers. 5. Et primum quaero utrum aliquod corpus sit, quod rem incorpoream, hoc est ipsius animae substantiam non deserat, cum dimiserit hoc terrenum corpus, ne forte de quatuor unum sit, aut aerium, aut aetherium. Cum enim incorporea sit anima, si omni corpore caret, iam una est omnium. Et ubi erit ille dives purpuratus, et Lazarus vulneratus? Quomodo etiam meritis discernentur, ut ille poenam, ille gaudium habeat, si una ex omnibus incorporeis apparuerit anima: si tamen figurate illa significata non sunt. Certum est autem, quae locis tenentur, corporibus tenentur, ut ille dives in flamma, et pauper ille in sinu Abrahae 5. Si loca sunt, corpora sunt, et in corporibus animae sunt; incorporeae aut si poenae vel praemia in conscientiis sunt. Quaevis est ista una anima, effecta ex multis animis, affligatur, et laetetur in una, ut appareat substantia ex multis animis collecta; aut si hoc dicitur quemadmodum una res animus incorporeus, et in eo memoria est, et voluntas, et intellectus, et hae omnes causae incorporeae sunt, et habent officiorum congruam portionem, nec tamen altera alteram impedit. Utcumque puto posse responderi, ut et aliquas poenae, et aliquas praemia comitentur in una ex multis animis collecta substantia. Quattuor corporis elementa: quod anima amittit? 6. Aut si non ita est, quid impedit si unusquisque animus, cum corpore hoc solido caret, aliud habeat corpus, ut ipse animus semper aliquod corpus animet; aut quo transitum facit, si ulla regio est ad quam eum necessitas ire compellit? Quandoquidem et ipsi Angeli nec multi dici possunt, si non corporibus numerentur; ut ait ipsa Veritas in Evangelio: Possem rogare Patrem meum ut duodecim mihi legiones angelorum misisset 6. Deinde cum constet Samuelem in corpore fuisse visum, quando excitatus est ad petitionem Saul 7; et Moysen, cuius corpus sepultum est secundum Evangelium, manifestum sit in corpore eum venisse ad Dominum in monte 8, cum constitissent. Quamquam et in apocryphis, et in secretis ipsius Moysi, quae scriptura caret auctoritate, tunc cum ascenderet in montem ut moreretur, vi corporis efficitur, ut aliud esset quod terrae mandaretur, aliud quod angelo comitanti sociaretur. Sed non satis urget me apocryphorum praeferre sententiam illis superioribus rebus definitis. Videndum ergo, et sive auctoritate sive ratione indagandum quod quaeritur. Sed dicitur quod resurrectio futura ostendat eam omni corpore caruisse. Nec satis impedit, quandoquidem illi Angeli, qui invisibiles etiam sunt, cum corporibus apparere voluerunt et videri, et quaecumque illa positio corporum sit, eorum spiritibus digna, tamen apparuerunt ad Abraham 9 et ad Tobiam 10. Ita fieri potest ut resurrectio quidem carnis istius, quae bene creditur futura sit, tamen sic anima illa reddatur, ut corpore aliquo numquam caruisse reperiatur. Cum enim ex quatuor elementis corpus ipsum constet, unum videtur amittere, calidum scilicet, cum e corpore isto migrare videatur. Nam remanet quod terrenum est, et liquor non deest; nec frigidae materiae elementum abest: solum illi eximitur calidum; quod forte secum ipse animus trahit, si de loco ad locum migrat. Hoc interim de corpore dixerim. Anima, corpore exuta, vivacior an torpidior? 7. Videtur quoque mihi quod si in corpore positus, ut iam dixi, vegeto, strenua utitur mentis intentione, quanto magis expeditus, agilis, vegetus, fervens, strenuus, intentus erit, et capacior efficitur ac melior, ut in corpore positus gustaverit virtutem! Quo deposito magis quoque abstersa nube, totus serenus effectus est, in tranquillitate sine tentatione positus, videat quod desideraverit, amplexetur quod amavit. Recordetur quoque et amicorum, et quos iam praemiserat, agnoscat, et quos post se dimisit: forte sic est; ego nescio, discere quaero. Satis autem me perturbat, si soporem quemdam accipit animus ipse, ne talis sit, qualis cum dormit in corpore constitutus, quasi sepultus, et in spe tantum vivens: caeterum nihil habens, nihil sciens; maxime si somnio nullo pulsetur. Quae res vehementer terret, et quasi exstinctum indicat animum. Utrum defuncti possint sine corpore apparere. 8. Illud etiam quaero, si corpus habere fuerit indagatus, utrum et aliquo sensu non careat? Certe si non odorandi necessitas ei, ut puto, ingeri potest, neque gustandi, sed nec tangendi: dubito remanere videndi et audiendi. Nam quid est quod audire dicuntur daemones, non in omnibus quos vexant, nam et in his quaestio est; sed etiam cum apparent in corporibus suis? De visu autem quomodo transeunt de loco in locum, si corpus habent, si sensu visibili duce carent? Putas non ita sunt animae humanae cum de corporibus egrediuntur, ut et corpus aliquod habeant, et sensu aliquo non careant? Quid est et illud, quod plerique mortui visi sunt in domibus ita ingredi, ut soliti sunt, aut per diem, aut per noctem a vigilantibus, ab ambulantibus? Non hoc semel audivi, et illud quod dicitur plerumque in quadam particula noctis, in locis in quibus humata corpora sunt, et maxime in basilicis fieri tumultus et orationes. Non enim ab uno hoc audisse me memini; nam testis est visionis istius vir quidam sanctus presbyter, qui multitudinem talium de baptisterio exeuntium in corporibus lucidis, et postea in medio ipsius ecclesiae orationes adverterit. Haec ergo omnia aut illi nostrae inquisitioni favent, aut si fabulae sunt, mirum: tamen vellem aliquid ex hac re nosse, quia veniunt, et visitant, et videntur exceptis somniis. Monachos quosdam apparuisse nuntiantes quae postea evenerint. 9. Ex quibus alia nascitur quaestio. Non enim modo phantasiam ego curo, quam sibi cor ineruditum fingit: visitationes loquor. Quomodo apparuit Ioseph per somnium 11, quomodo plerique visitati sunt. Sic ergo et nostri quos praemisimus aliquando veniunt, ipsi apparent per somnium, et loquuntur. Nam memini me ego ipse, et Profuturum, et Privatum, et Servilium, quos memini sanctos viros de monasterio praecessisse, locutos mihi, et ita factum fuisse ut dixerunt. Aut si aliquis spiritus melior est, qui eorum figuram assumit, et mentem visitat, viderit ille cui omnia nuda a summa cervice sunt. Si quid ergo de his omnibus tuae Sanctitati Dominus per rationem loqui dignabitur, rogo ut facere me digneris participem huius scientiae. Praeterire autem et hoc nolui; forte enim pertinet ad inquisitionem meam. Illum iuvenem praenuntiasse patris mortem. 10. Puer ipse de quo agitur, tempore quo solvebatur, exhibitus quodammodo pergit. Nam videtur per somnium condiscipulus et conlector ipsius, cum quo mihi excipiebat, qui iam ante octo menses corpore erat exemptus, venisse. Cum interrogaretur ab eo qui eum tunc cernebat, cur advenisset; ait ille, Ad amicum meum hunc ducendum veni: et ita factum est. Nam et in domo ipsa seni cuidam pene vigilanti, apparuit homo laurum portans in manu, scriptum. At ubi ille visus est, adiungitur adhuc quod post exitum pueri, pater ipsius presbyter cum sene Theasio in monasterio esse coeperant consolandi se gratia, sed post tertium diem pueri defuncti, videtur idem puer ad monasterium ingressus, et a quodam fratre per quoddam somnium interrogatur utrum sciret se fuisse mortuum? Dixit se scire. Utrum fuisset a Deo receptus? Et hoc secum magna retulit gratulatione. Cumque causa quaereretur cur advenisset, ait tunc ille: Missus sum ut exhibeam patrem meum. Evigilat cui haec ostendebantur, et narrat. Pervenit usque ad aurem episcopi Theasii. Qui permotus obiurgavit dicentem, ne facile perveniret ad aurem presbyteri, et perturbaretur tali nuntio. Quid diu? Post dies forte quatuor visitationis cum loquitur, nam modicam senserat febriculam, periculum nullum erat, medicus aberat, qui penitus sollicitudinem nullam esse testaretur: at ubi se in lectum inclinavit, solutus est idem presbyter. Nec taceo, et in hoc ipso die quo puer solvebatur, petit patrem ad pacem, et petit tertio, et in singulis osculis dicebat patri, Pater, dicamus Deo gratias; et patrem cogebat ut pariter secum dixisset, quasi communem exhortans ad migrandum ex hac vita. Nam inter utrosque septem dies medii numerantur. Quid fiet de tantis rebus? Quis erit occultarum istarum causarum fidelissimus magister? Aestus cordis mei refundit se tibi in tempore angustiae. Dispensatio exitus pueri, eiusque patris est manifesta, quia duo passeres non cadent ad terram sine voluntate Patris 12. Contemplatio intellectiva: animae beatitudo post mortem. 11. Animam ergo omni corpore carere penitus non posse, illa res, ut puto, ostendit, quia Deus solus omni corpore semper caret. Post transitum autem animam, quam magis vigilantiorem fore arbitror, expositio tantae molis corporeae ostendit; tunc enim in actione et cognitione expedita tanto vinculo, ut puto, apparet praestantior, et omnis illa quies spiritalis, omnibus perturbationibus et erroribus liberam demonstrat, non marcidam, et quasi segnem, et torpidam, et implicatam facit: quippe cui sufficit perfrui etiam ipsa libertate quam adepta est, cum mundo et corpore caret; nam intellectum ea pasci, et ponere os spiritale ad fontem vitae prudenter dixisti, ubi est felix et beata proprietate mentis suae. Nam aliquando ego Servilium fratrem post eius exitum per somnium vidi adhuc positus in monasterio, qui dixit quod nos per rationem laboremus tendere ad intellectum, se autem et tales in ipsa contemplationis delectatione manere. Quid sit creata sapientia, quid increata. 12. Peto quoque ut quot modis sapientia dicatur, ostendas mihi; ut sapientia Deus, ut sapientia animus sapiens, quomodo dicitur ut lux, ut sapientia Beseleel qui fabricatus est Tabernaculum, vel unguentarium13, ut sapientia Salomonis14, vel si qua est alia, et quid invicem distent: et utrum una illa sapientia aeterna cum Patre in his gradibus intellegenda sit, quomodo diversa munera dicuntur Spiritus sancti qui dividit unicuique propria prout vult15. An excepta illa sola sapientia quae facta non est, istae factae sunt, et propriam habent substantiam? an effecta sunt et ex definitione operis acceperunt? Multa requiro; det tibi Dominus et gratiam inveniendi, et sapientiam dictandi, et ad nos celeriter scribendi. Imperite et rustice scripsi: sed quia dignaris nosse quid quaeram, per Christum Dominum obsecro ut in his corrigas me, et doceas quod intellegis me scire cupere.