Letter 12: To my most holy brother Caesarius,
To my most holy brother Caesarius,
The question of how bishops care for their own clergy — how they pastor the pastors, as it were — is one I have been thinking about a great deal.
The standard model is essentially administrative: the bishop oversees the clergy, disciplines those who err, confirms those who perform well, and otherwise leaves them to do their work. This model is not wrong but it is insufficient. A priest who is struggling spiritually, who has lost his sense of why he entered the ministry, who is going through the motions without any real interior engagement — none of this shows up in an administrative review.
What I try to do, though I do not always succeed, is to have substantive conversations with my clergy about their actual experience of the ministry. Not just "are the records in order" but "how is the prayer life? What are you reading? What is the most difficult thing you are dealing with right now?" These conversations take time that is often hard to find. But they produce a different kind of relationship — and a different kind of accountability — than administrative oversight alone.
I am not certain this is the best approach or that I am executing it well. I offer it as one possibility.
Desiderius
AI-assisted translation — This translation was produced with AI assistance and has not been peer-reviewed. See the 19th-century translation or original Latin/Greek below for scholarly use.
Related Letters
(In a.d. 368 the City of Nicæa in Bithynia was almost entirely destroyed by a terrible earthquake. Cæsarius lost his house, and his personal escape was almost miraculous.
To my dear brother Caesarius,
What I had hoped for on the basis of your reputation, I now confirm through the evidence of your letters.
Your last letter raised the question of how to handle clergy who prove, after ordination, to have misrepresented...
To the most holy Caesarius,