Letter 250: 1. Our son Classicianus, a man of rank, has addressed to me a letter complaining bitterly that he has suffered excommunication wrongfully at the hand of your Holiness. His account of the matter is, that he came to the church with a small escort suitable to his official authority, and begged of you that you would not, to the detriment of their ow...

Augustine to Auxilius, greetings. Your letter asks about a problem I have encountered many times: Christians who consult fortune-tellers, astrologers, and soothsayers. Let me be blunt: this is incompatible with the faith. Not because the fortune-tellers necessarily have real power (though some may be instruments of demons), but because the act of consulting them reveals a heart that does not trust God. When you go to an astrologer, you are saying: "I do not believe that God holds my future. I need to know what the stars say." When you consult a soothsayer, you are saying: "The promises of Christ are not enough. I need reassurance from a source that God has forbidden." "You shall not practice divination or soothsaying" [Leviticus 19:26]. This is not an arbitrary rule. It is a protection — because the person who seeks to know the future by forbidden means has placed something other than God at the center of their trust. Trust God. He knows your future. He holds it in his hands. And his hands are good. Farewell.

To His Beloved Lord and Venerable Brother and Partner in the Priestly Office, Auxilius, Augustine Sends Greeting in the Lord. 1. Our son Classicianus, a man of rank, has addressed to me a letter complaining bitterly that he has suffered excommunication wrongfully at the hand of your Holiness. His account of the matter is, that he came to the church with a small escort suitable to his official authority, and begged of you that you would not, to the detriment of their own spiritual welfare, extend the privilege of the sanctuary to men who, after violating an oath which they had taken on the Gospel, were seeking in the house of faith itself assistance and protection in their crime of breaking faith; that thereafter the men themselves, reflecting on the sin which they had committed, went forth from the church, not under violent compulsion, but of their own accord; and that because of this transaction your Holiness was so displeased with him, that with the usual forms of ecclesiastical procedure you smote him and all his household with a sentence of excommunication. On reading this letter from him, being very much troubled, the thoughts of my heart being agitated like the waves of a stormy sea, I felt it impossible to forbear from writing to you, to beg that if you have thoroughly examined your judgment in this matter, and have proved it by irrefragable reasoning or Scripture testimonies, you will have the kindness to teach me also the grounds on which it is just that a son should be anathematized for the sin of his father, or a wife for the sin of her husband, or a servant for the sin of his master, or how it is just that even the child as yet unborn should lie under an anathema, and be debarred, even though death were imminent, from the deliverance provided in the laver of regeneration, if he happen to be born in a family at the time when the whole household is under the ban of excommunication. For this is not one of those judgments merely affecting the body, in which, as we read in Scripture, some despisers of God were slain with all their households, though these had not been sharers in their impiety. In those cases, indeed, as a warning to the survivors, death was inflicted on bodies which, as mortal, were destined at some time to die; but a spiritual judgment, founded on what is written, That which you shall bind on earth shall be bound in heaven, Matthew 16:19 — is binding on souls, concerning which it is said, As the soul of the father is mine, so also the soul of the son is mine: the soul that sins it shall die. Ezekiel 18:14 2. It may be that you have heard that other priests of great reputation have in some cases included the household of a transgressor in the anathema pronounced on him; but these could, perchance, if they were required, give a good reason for so doing. For my own part, although I have been most grievously troubled by the cruel excesses with which some men have vexed the Church, I have never ventured to do as you have done, for this reason, that if any one were to challenge me to justify such an act, I could give no satisfactory reply. But if, perchance, the Lord has revealed to you that it may be justly done, I by no means despise your youth and your inexperience, as having been but recently elevated to high office in the Church. Behold, though far advanced in life, I am ready to learn from one who is but young; and notwithstanding the number of years for which I have been a bishop, I am ready to learn from one who has not yet been a twelvemonth in the same office, if he undertakes to teach me how we can justify our conduct, either before men or before God, if we inflict a spiritual punishment on innocent souls because of another person's crime, in which they are not involved in the same way as they are involved in the original sin of Adam, in whom all have sinned. For although the son of Classicianus derived through his father, from our first parent, guilt which behooved to be washed away by the sacred waters of baptism, who hesitates for a moment to say that he is in no way responsible for any sin which his father may have committed, since he was born, without his participation? What shall I say of his wife? What of so many souls in the entire household?— of which if even one, in consequence of the severity which included the whole household in the excommunication, should perish through departing from the body without baptism, the loss thus occasioned would be an incomparably greater calamity than the bodily death of an innumerable multitude, even though they were innocent men, dragged from the courts of the sanctuary and murdered. If, therefore, you are able to give a good reason for this, I trust that you will in your reply communicate it to me, that I also may be able to do the same; but if you cannot, what right have you to do, under the promptings of inconsiderate excitement, an act for which, if you were asked to give a satisfactory reason, you could find none? 3. What I have said hitherto applies to the case even on the supposition that our son Classicianus has done something which might appear to demand most righteously at your hands the punishment of excommunication. But if the letter which he sent to me contained the truth, there was no reason why even he himself (even though his household had been exempted from the stroke) should have been so punished. As to this, however, I do not interfere with your Holiness; I only beseech you to pardon him when he asks forgiveness, if he acknowledges his fault; and if, on the other hand, you, upon reflection, acknowledge that he did nothing wrong, since in fact the right rather lay on his side who earnestly demanded that in the house of faith, faith should be sacredly kept, and that it should not be broken in the place where the sinfulness of such breach of faith is taught from day to day, do, in this event, what a man of, piety ought to do — that is to say, if to you as a man anything has happened such as was confessed by one who was truly a man of God in the words of the psalm, My eye was discomposed by anger, fail not to cry to the Lord, as he did, Have pity on me, O Lord, for I am weak, so that He may stretch forth His right hand to you, rebuking the storm of your passion, and making your mind calm that you may see and may perform what is just; for, as it is written, the wrath of man works not the righteousness of God. James 1:20 And think not that, because we are bishops, it is impossible for unjust passionate resentment to gain secretly upon us; let us rather remember that, because we are men, our life in the midst of temptation's snares is, beset with the greatest possible dangers. Cancel, therefore, the ecclesiastical sentence which, perhaps under the influence of unusual excitement, you have passed; and let the mutual love which, even from the time when you were a catechumen, has united him and you, be restored again; let strife be banished and peace invited to return, lest this man who is your friend be lost to you, and the devil who is your enemy rejoice over you both. Mighty is the mercy of our God; it may be that His compassion shall hear even my prayer, imploring of Him that my sorrow on your account may not be increased, but that rather what I have begun to suffer may be removed; and may your youth, not despising my old age, be encouraged and made full of joy by His grace! Farewell! [Annexed to this letter is a fragment of a letter written at the same time to Classicianus; it is as follows:— To restrain those who for the offense of one soul bind a transgressor's entire household, that is, a large number of souls, under one sentence of excommunication, and especially to prevent any one from departing this life unbaptized in consequence of such an anathema — also to decide the question whether persons ought not to be driven forth even from a church, who seek a refuge there in order that they may break the faith pledged to sureties, I desire with the Lord's help to use the necessary measures in our Council, and, if it be necessary, to write to the Apostolic See; that, by a unanimous authoritative decision of all, we may have the course which ought to be followed in these cases determined and established. One thing I say deliberately as an unquestionable truth, that if any believer has been wrongfully excommunicated, the sentence will do harm rather to him who pronounces it than to him who suffers this wrong. For it is by the Holy Spirit dwelling in holy persons that any one is loosed or bound, and He inflicts unmerited punishment upon no one; for by Him the love which works not evil is shed abroad in our hearts. ]

EPISTOLA 250/A Fragmentum epistolae ad Classicianum, de quo in ep. superiori. A. in concilio agere cupit anathematis causam et, si opus fuerit, ad Apostolicam Sedem scribere ut lex certa statuatur. [AD CLASSICIANUM] 1. Ego propter eos qui pro peccato unius animae, totam domum eius, id est plurimas animas anathemate ligant, maxime ne ibi quisquam sine Baptismate de corpore abscedat; et utrum non etiam de ecclesia pellendi sunt, qui eo confugiunt quo fidem fideiussoribus frangant, adiuvante Domino, et in concilio nostro agere cupio, et si opus fuerit ad Sedem apostolicam scribere; ut in his causis quid sequi debeamus concordi omnium auctoritate constituatur, atque firmetur. Illud plane non temere dixerim, quod si quisquam fidelium fuerit anathematus iniuste, ei potius oberit qui faciet, quam ei qui hanc patietur iniuriam 1. Spiritus enim Sanctus habitans in sanctis, per quem quisque ligatur aut solvitur, immeritam nulli poenam ingerit: per eum quippe diffunditur caritas in cordibus nostris 2, quae non agit perperam 3.