Letter 66: Addressed, Without Salutation, to Crispinus, the Donatist Bishop of Calama. 1. You ought to have been influenced by the fear of God; but since, in your work of rebaptizing the Mappalians, you have chosen to take advantage of the fear with which as man you could inspire them, let me ask you what hinders the order of the sovereign from being carr...

Augustine of HippoCrispinus|c. 397 AD|augustine hippo
donatismimperial politicsproperty economics
Theological controversy; Imperial politics; Military conflict

Letter 66 — To Crispinus, Donatist Bishop of Calama: A Direct Challenge (A.D. 402)

Addressed without formal salutation to Crispinus, Donatist Bishop of Calama.

You ought to have been moved by the fear of God. Since you chose instead, in your rebaptizing of the Mappalians, to rely on the fear that you as a man could inspire in them, let me ask you this: what prevents the Emperor's order from being enforced throughout the province, when the order of the provincial governor has been so fully carried out in a single village? Compare the persons: you are a tenant-in-possession, he is the Emperor. Compare the situations: you are on an estate, he is on a throne. Compare the causes: his aim is to heal division; yours is to tear unity apart.

But I do not tell you to be afraid of a man. Even though we could move to compel you to pay the ten pounds of gold prescribed by imperial decree as the penalty for rebaptizing members of the Church — perhaps you could not even pay the fine, having spent so much money buying the very people you then compelled to undergo the rite.

No, I do not tell you to fear man. I tell you to fear Christ. What answer would you give him if he said to you: "Crispinus, was it a great price that you paid to purchase the fear of the Mappalian peasants? And does my death — the price I paid to purchase the love of all the nations — seem so little to you? Was the money counted out from your purse to acquire these serfs for rebaptism a more precious sacrifice than the blood that flowed from my side to redeem the nations for baptism?"

I know that if you would listen to Christ, you would hear far more than this. And you might even be warned, by the very property you have acquired, how impious are the things you have said against him. If you believe that human law secures your title to what you have bought with money, how much more securely does divine law secure Christ's title to what he has bought with his own blood? He of whom it is written, "He shall have dominion from sea to sea, and from the river to the ends of the earth" (Psalm 72:8), shall hold what he purchased with unconquerable power. But what assurance can you have of retaining what you claim to have made your own in Africa, when you assert that Christ has lost the whole world — that all he has left is Africa?

Let me propose something simple. If these Mappalians passed into your communion of their own free will, let them hear both of us on the question that divides us — our respective arguments written down and translated into Punic after being attested by our signatures — and then, with all pressure of fear from their landlord removed, let these tenants freely choose for themselves. For by the very fact that you chose to use the means you used — the leverage of ownership — you have implicitly admitted that you do not trust the merits of your own cause to persuade free men.

Farewell — if you will hear the truth.

Modern English rendering for readability. See the 19th-century translation or original Latin/Greek for scholarly use.

Related Letters