Letter 190: 1. The interest which you have shown in the affairs of the Isaurian Church is only what might have been expected from that zeal and propriety of conduct which so continually rouses my admiration of you. The most careless observer must at once perceive that it is in all respects more advantageous for care and anxiety to be divided among several b...
Basil of Caesarea→Amphilochius, of Iconium|c. 368 AD|basil caesarea
illnessimperial politicsproperty economics
Imperial politics; Travel & mobility; Military conflict
From: Basil, Bishop of Caesarea
To: Amphilochius, Bishop of Iconium
Date: ~368 AD
Context: Basil responds to Amphilochius's concern about the Isaurian church's need for more bishops, weighing the advantages of multiple appointments against the risk of ordaining unfit men.
Your interest in the affairs of the Isaurian church is exactly what I would expect from the zeal and good judgment that continually earn my admiration. Even the most casual observer can see that it is in every way better for responsibility and oversight to be divided among several bishops. You have noticed this yourself and done well to bring the situation to my attention.
But finding the right men is not easy. While we naturally want the credit that comes from numbers and desire to see God's church more effectively governed through more officers, we must be careful not to bring the ministry into disrepute by appointing men of poor character, and in the process teach the laity to be indifferent. You know well enough that the conduct of the governed usually matches the conduct of those set over them.
Perhaps, then, it would be better to appoint one thoroughly proven man -- though even this may not be simple -- to oversee the whole city, and entrust him with managing the details on his own authority. Only let him be "a servant of God, a workman who needs not be ashamed" [2 Timothy 2:15], "not looking to his own interests but to the interests of the many, that they may be saved" [cf. Philippians 2:4, 1 Thessalonians 2:16]. If he finds himself overwhelmed, he can bring in fellow workers for the harvest.
If we can find such a man, I genuinely believe that one good bishop is worth many mediocre ones, and that this approach will serve the churches better while exposing us to less risk. If, however, that proves too difficult, let us first appoint overseers to the small towns and villages that have traditionally been episcopal sees, and then worry about the larger appointments afterward.
ST. BASIL OF CAESAREA
To Amphilochius, bishop of Iconium.
1. The interest which you have shown in the affairs of the Isaurian Church is only what might have been expected from that zeal and propriety of conduct which so continually rouses my admiration of you. The most careless observer must at once perceive that it is in all respects more advantageous for care and anxiety to be divided among several bishops. This has not escaped your observation, and you have done well in noting, and in acquainting me with, the position of affairs. But it is not easy to find fit men. While, then, we are desirous of having the credit that comes of numbers, and cause God's Church to be more effectively administered by more officers, let us be careful lest we unwittingly bring the word into contempt on account of the unsatisfactory character of the men who are called to office, and accustom the laity to indifference. You yourself know well that the conduct of the governed is commonly of a piece with that of those who are set over them. Perhaps therefore it might be better to appoint one well approved man, though even this may not be an easy matter, to the supervision of the whole city, and entrust him with the management of details on his own responsibility. Only let him be a servant of God, a workman that needs not to be ashamed, 2 Timothy 2:15 not looking on his own things, Philippians 2:4 but on the things of the most, that they be saved. 1 Thessalonians 2:16 If he finds himself overweighted with responsibility, he will associate other labourers for the harvest with himself. If only we can find such a man, I own that I think the one worth many, and the ordering of the cure of souls in this way likely to be attended at once with more advantage to the Churches and with less risk to us. If, however, this course prove difficult, let us first do our best to appoint superintendents to the small townships or villages which have of old been episcopal sees. Then afterwards we will appoint once more the [bishop] of the city. Unless we take this course the man appointed may prove a hindrance to subsequent administration, and from his wish to rule over a larger diocese, and his refusal to accept the ordination of the bishops, we may find ourselves suddenly involved in a domestic quarrel. If this course is difficult, and time does not allow, see to it that the Isaurian bishop is strictly kept within his own bounds by ordaining some of his immediate neighbours. In the future it will be reserved for us to give to the rest bishops at the proper season, after we have carefully examined those whom we ourselves may judge to be most fit.
2. I have asked George, as you requested. He replies as you reported. In all this we must remain quiet, casting the care of the house on the Lord. For I put my trust in the Holy God that He will by my aid grant to him deliverance from his difficulties in some other way, and to me to live my life without trouble. If this cannot be, be so good as to send me word yourself as to what part I must look after, that I may begin to ask this favour of each of my friends in power, either for nothing, or for some moderate price, as the Lord may prosper me.
I have, in accordance with your request, written to brother Valerius. Matters at Nyssa are going on as they were left by your reverence, and, by the aid of your holiness, are improving. Of those who were then separated from me some have gone off to the court, and some remain waiting for tidings from it. The Lord is able as well to frustrate the expectations of these latter as to make the return of the former useless.
3. Philo, on the authority of some Jewish tradition, explains the manna to have been of such a nature that it changed with the taste of the eater: that of itself it was like millet seed boiled in honey; it served sometimes for bread, sometimes for meat, either of birds or beasts; at other times for vegetables, according to each man's liking; even for fish so that the flavour of each separate kind was exactly reproduced in the eater's mouth.
Scripture recognises chariots containing three riders, because while other chariots contained two, the driver and the man-at-arms, Pharaoh's held three, two men-at-arms, and one to hold the reins.
Sympius has written me a letter expressive of respect and communion. The letter which I have written in reply I am sending to your holiness, that you may send it on to him if you quite approve of it, with the addition of some communication from yourself. May you, by the loving kindness of the Holy One, be preserved for me and for the Church of God, in good health, happy in the Lord, and ever praying for me.
About this page
Source. Translated by Blomfield Jackson. From Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, Second Series, Vol. 8. Edited by Philip Schaff and Henry Wace. (Buffalo, NY: Christian Literature Publishing Co., 1895.) Revised and edited for New Advent by Kevin Knight. <https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/3202190.htm>.
Contact information. The editor of New Advent is Kevin Knight. My email address is feedback732 at newadvent.org. (To help fight spam, this address might change occasionally.) Regrettably, I can't reply to every letter, but I greatly appreciate your feedback — especially notifications about typographical errors and inappropriate ads.
◆
From:Basil, Bishop of Caesarea
To:Amphilochius, Bishop of Iconium
Date:~368 AD
Context:Basil responds to Amphilochius's concern about the Isaurian church's need for more bishops, weighing the advantages of multiple appointments against the risk of ordaining unfit men.
Your interest in the affairs of the Isaurian church is exactly what I would expect from the zeal and good judgment that continually earn my admiration. Even the most casual observer can see that it is in every way better for responsibility and oversight to be divided among several bishops. You have noticed this yourself and done well to bring the situation to my attention.
But finding the right men is not easy. While we naturally want the credit that comes from numbers and desire to see God's church more effectively governed through more officers, we must be careful not to bring the ministry into disrepute by appointing men of poor character, and in the process teach the laity to be indifferent. You know well enough that the conduct of the governed usually matches the conduct of those set over them.
Perhaps, then, it would be better to appoint one thoroughly proven man -- though even this may not be simple -- to oversee the whole city, and entrust him with managing the details on his own authority. Only let him be "a servant of God, a workman who needs not be ashamed" [2 Timothy 2:15], "not looking to his own interests but to the interests of the many, that they may be saved" [cf. Philippians 2:4, 1 Thessalonians 2:16]. If he finds himself overwhelmed, he can bring in fellow workers for the harvest.
If we can find such a man, I genuinely believe that one good bishop is worth many mediocre ones, and that this approach will serve the churches better while exposing us to less risk. If, however, that proves too difficult, let us first appoint overseers to the small towns and villages that have traditionally been episcopal sees, and then worry about the larger appointments afterward.
Modern English rendering for readability. See the 19th-century translation or original Latin/Greek for scholarly use.