Letter 1023: Avitus, bishop, to the most excellent Lord Sigismund.
Avitus, bishop, to the most excellent Lord Sigismund.
I have been debtor to the obligation of serving your court for all my years as bishop, and I want to honor that debt in a way that is genuine rather than ceremonial.
What I want to say to you is not primarily political, though it has political implications. It is theological.
You have been raised in the Arian tradition. You know its arguments; you have heard them from your father and from the clergy who serve your court. I have no illusion that a single letter will change a lifetime's formation. But I want to say, as clearly and honestly as I can, what I believe the Arian tradition gets wrong, and why it matters.
The Arian tradition says that Christ is divine, but differently divine from the Father — the first of God's creatures, the greatest of all beings, but still created and therefore not fully God. The Catholic tradition says that Christ is of the same substance as the Father — fully and completely divine, not a secondary divinity.
The pastoral difference between these positions is this: if Christ is less than fully divine, then what he offers to humanity is less than full union with God. He can show us the way; he cannot bring us fully into the life of God. The Catholic position is that God became fully human precisely so that humanity could become fully united with God. This is not just a doctrinal nicety. It determines what salvation actually is.
I am always available to continue this conversation.
Avitus
Modern English rendering for readability. See the 19th-century translation or original Latin/Greek for scholarly use.
Related Letters
Avitus, bishop, to the most excellent Lord Sigismund.
Copy of the petition from the least of the archimandrites and the rest of the monks of the province of Second Syria.
Hormisdas to John, bishop of Nicopolis.
I owe you a letter, and I pay the debt gladly.
From Bishop Ruricius to the lord Hispanus.