...except that if anyone is reported to the emperor as being disorderly, punishment is immediate. But against those who do not approach the gods, there is arrayed the host of evil spirits, by whom many of the godless are driven mad and persuaded to long for death, imagining they will fly up to heaven when they tear their souls from their bodies by violence. Some even pursue the wilderness instead of cities -- though man is by nature a civilized and gentle creature -- having given themselves over to evil spirits who lead them into this misanthropy. Many of them have even invented chains and iron collars for themselves, so thoroughly does the evil spirit drive them from every side -- the spirit to whom they have willingly surrendered themselves by abandoning the eternal and saving gods. But enough has been said about these people. Let me return to where I digressed.
As for justice according to the civil laws, it is obvious that the governors of the cities will see to it. But it would also be fitting for you priests to exhort men not to transgress the laws of the gods, since the priestly life must be more dignified than the civic. This must be taught and practiced. The better sort will follow, as is natural. I pray that all will do so, but I expect it of those who are by nature reasonable and earnest, for they will recognize these words as their own.
Above all else, philanthropy must be practiced. For many blessings follow from it, and chief among them is the goodwill of the gods. Just as servants who share their masters' interests in friendships, pursuits, and affections are loved more than their fellow servants, so we must believe that the divine nature, being itself philanthropic, loves those men who are philanthropic. Philanthropy takes many forms: punishing men sparingly for their own improvement, as teachers punish children; and remedying their needs, as the gods remedy ours. Consider how many good things the gods have given us from the earth -- food of every kind, and in such quantity as not even all the animals together enjoy. Since we were born naked, they clothed us with the hair of animals, with plants from the earth, and with the products of trees. And this was done not simply or carelessly, as Moses said about receiving garments of skin, but see how many were the gifts of Athena the Worker! What animal uses wine? What animal uses olive oil? -- except when we ourselves share these things with them, we who will not share with our fellow human beings. What sea creature uses grain? What land creature uses the products of the sea? I say nothing yet of gold, bronze, and iron, with which the gods have made us exceedingly rich -- not so that we may look on with indifference while the poor wander about in disgrace, especially when some of them are of good character and are poor only because their generous nature keeps them from desiring wealth, even though they received no inheritance. When the multitude sees such people, they reproach the gods. But the gods are not responsible for their poverty. It is the insatiable greed of us who possess wealth that causes men to hold false opinions about the gods and, moreover, brings undeserved reproach upon them. Why do we demand that the god rain gold upon the poor as he once did upon the Rhodians? Even if this happened, we would quickly station our servants everywhere and set out our vessels to drive everyone else away, so that we alone might seize the gods' common gifts. One might well marvel that we demand what cannot naturally occur and is entirely useless, while failing to do what is in our power. For who has ever become poor by sharing with his neighbors? I myself have often given to those in need and received many times as much back from the gods, though I am a poor man of business, and I have never regretted giving. And I do not speak of the present -- for it would be entirely unreasonable to compare a private person's charity with an emperor's provision -- but when I was still a private citizen, I know this happened to me many times. My grandmother's entire estate was restored to me, though it had been violently seized by others, even as I was spending from my small resources on those in need.
We must share our wealth with all human beings, but more generously with the virtuous, and to the poor and destitute enough to relieve their want. I would even say -- paradoxical though it sounds -- that it is right to give clothing and food even to the wicked, for we give to the human being, not to the character. Therefore I think that even those confined in prisons deserve such care. For this philanthropy will not hinder justice. When many are imprisoned awaiting trial, and some will be convicted while others will be acquitted, it would be hard not to show some compassion even to the wicked for the sake of the innocent, rather than to treat even the guiltless with cruelty and inhumanity on account of the wicked.
This thought strikes me as utterly unjust: we call Zeus the god of hospitality, and yet we are more inhospitable than the Scythians. How then can one who wishes to sacrifice to Zeus the Hospitable approach his temple? With what sort of conscience, having forgotten that "all strangers and beggars are from Zeus, and a gift, though small, is welcome"?
How can the man who worships Zeus the god of fellowship, seeing his neighbors in want and not sharing even a drachma, think he is worshipping Zeus properly? When I consider these things I am utterly at a loss, seeing the titles of the gods preserved among us since the beginning of the world like painted images, while in practice nothing of the sort is done by us. The gods are called "gods of kinship" among us, and Zeus is called the god of kinship, yet we treat our relatives as strangers. For every human being is related to every other, whether willingly or not -- whether, as some say, we are all descended from one man and one woman, or whether the gods brought us all into being together with the world at its beginning, not one man and one woman but many men and many women at once.
We must also consider how many arguments the ancients devoted to the proposition that man is by nature a social creature. Shall we, then, who have said and established these things, behave unsociably toward our neighbors? Let each of us, proceeding from such customs and practices, fulfill the works of piety: reverence toward the gods, kindness toward human beings, purity of body. Let each always strive to think reverently about the gods, and gaze upon the sanctuaries and statues of the gods with honor and piety, worshipping them as if the gods were present. For our fathers established statues, altars, the keeping of undying fire, and all such things as symbols of the gods' presence -- not so that we should regard them as gods, but so that through them we might worship the gods. Since we, being in bodies, must render our worship to the gods in bodily form, though they themselves are bodiless, they first showed us the second race of gods -- those who circle the heavens all around -- as images of the first. And since worship could not be rendered to these either in bodily form, for they need nothing by nature, a second kind of image was devised on earth, by performing our rites toward which we shall make the gods favorable to ourselves. Just as those who tend the images of kings, though the kings need nothing, nevertheless draw their goodwill toward themselves, so too those who tend the images of the gods, though the gods need nothing, nevertheless persuade them to help and care for them.
Let us not, then, looking upon the images of the gods, think them to be stones or wood -- nor yet think them to be the gods themselves. Whoever loves the king gladly looks upon the king's image; whoever loves his child gladly looks upon the child's image; whoever loves his father, upon the father's. So too whoever loves the gods gladly gazes upon their images and statues, reverencing them and trembling at the gods who see him from the unseen.
To Photinus 4
Moreover the Emperor Julian, faithless to Christ, in his attack on
Diodorus 5 writes as follows to Photinus the heresiarch: 1 Ο
Photinus, you at any rate seem to maintain what is probably true, and come nearest to being saved, and do well to believe that he whom one holds to be a god can by no means be brought into the womb. But
Diodorus, a charlatan priest of the Nazarene, when he tries to give point to that nonsensical theory about the womb by artifices and juggler's tricks, is clearly a sharp-witted sophist of that creed of the country-folk.
A little further on he says: But if only the gods and goddesses and all the Muses and Fortune will lend me their aid, I hope to show 2 that he is feeble and a corrupter of laws and customs, of pagan 3 Mysteries and Mysteries of the gods of the underworld, and that that new-fangled Galilaean god of his, whom he by a false myth styles eternal, has been stripped by his humiliating death and burial of the divinity falsely ascribed to him by
Diodorus. Then, just as people who are convicted of error always begin to invent, being the slaves of artifice rather than of truth, he goes on to say: For the fellow sailed to Athens to the injury of the general welfare, then rashly took to philosophy and engaged in the study of literature, and by the devices of rhetoric armed his hateful tongue against the heavenly gods, and being utterly ignorant of the Mysteries of the pagans he so to speak imbibed most deplorably the whole mistaken folly of the base and ignorant creed-making fishermen. For this conduct he has long ago been punished
by the gods themselves. For, for many years past, he has been in danger, having contracted a wasting disease
of the chest, and he now suffers extreme torture. His whole body has wasted away. For his cheeks have fallen in and his body is deeply lined with wrinkles.1 But this is no sign of philosophic habits, as he wishes it to seem to those who are deceived by him, but most certainly a sign of justice done and of punishment from the gods which has stricken him down in suitable proportion to his crime, since he must live out to the very end his painful and bitter life, his appearance that of a man pale and wasted.
4 These fragments of a lost letter are preserved only in the Latin version of
Facundus Hermianensis, who wrote at Constantinople about 546 A.D. For a partial reconstruction of the original see Neumann,
Contra Christianos, Leipzig, 1880, ρ 5. This letter may have been written at any time between
Julian's arrival at Antioch in July 362 and his departure thence, in March 363. The Greek original is represented by curious and sometimes untranslatable Latin.
Photinus, bishop of Sirmium, where Constantius resided in 351, was tried, deposed and banished by a synod convened there by
Constantius. According to Sozomen 4. 6, he wrote many Greek and Latin works in support of his heretical views on the divinity of Christ, which were opposed by both Arians and
Nicaeans. He is mentioned by Julian, Against the Galilaeans 262c.
5 Bishop of Tarsus, a celebrated teacher; he was at Antioch in 362.
1 The italicised passages are the words of Facundus.
2 This is a forecast of Julian's treatise Against the
Galilaeans.
3 Twice in this letter Facundus translates Julian's "Hellenic" as "pagan."
1 Here and in the last sentence I give what seems to be the general meaning.
...except that if anyone is reported to the emperor as being disorderly, punishment is immediate. But against those who do not approach the gods, there is arrayed the host of evil spirits, by whom many of the godless are driven mad and persuaded to long for death, imagining they will fly up to heaven when they tear their souls from their bodies by violence. Some even pursue the wilderness instead of cities -- though man is by nature a civilized and gentle creature -- having given themselves over to evil spirits who lead them into this misanthropy. Many of them have even invented chains and iron collars for themselves, so thoroughly does the evil spirit drive them from every side -- the spirit to whom they have willingly surrendered themselves by abandoning the eternal and saving gods. But enough has been said about these people. Let me return to where I digressed.
As for justice according to the civil laws, it is obvious that the governors of the cities will see to it. But it would also be fitting for you priests to exhort men not to transgress the laws of the gods, since the priestly life must be more dignified than the civic. This must be taught and practiced. The better sort will follow, as is natural. I pray that all will do so, but I expect it of those who are by nature reasonable and earnest, for they will recognize these words as their own.
Above all else, philanthropy must be practiced. For many blessings follow from it, and chief among them is the goodwill of the gods. Just as servants who share their masters' interests in friendships, pursuits, and affections are loved more than their fellow servants, so we must believe that the divine nature, being itself philanthropic, loves those men who are philanthropic. Philanthropy takes many forms: punishing men sparingly for their own improvement, as teachers punish children; and remedying their needs, as the gods remedy ours. Consider how many good things the gods have given us from the earth -- food of every kind, and in such quantity as not even all the animals together enjoy. Since we were born naked, they clothed us with the hair of animals, with plants from the earth, and with the products of trees. And this was done not simply or carelessly, as Moses said about receiving garments of skin, but see how many were the gifts of Athena the Worker! What animal uses wine? What animal uses olive oil? -- except when we ourselves share these things with them, we who will not share with our fellow human beings. What sea creature uses grain? What land creature uses the products of the sea? I say nothing yet of gold, bronze, and iron, with which the gods have made us exceedingly rich -- not so that we may look on with indifference while the poor wander about in disgrace, especially when some of them are of good character and are poor only because their generous nature keeps them from desiring wealth, even though they received no inheritance. When the multitude sees such people, they reproach the gods. But the gods are not responsible for their poverty. It is the insatiable greed of us who possess wealth that causes men to hold false opinions about the gods and, moreover, brings undeserved reproach upon them. Why do we demand that the god rain gold upon the poor as he once did upon the Rhodians? Even if this happened, we would quickly station our servants everywhere and set out our vessels to drive everyone else away, so that we alone might seize the gods' common gifts. One might well marvel that we demand what cannot naturally occur and is entirely useless, while failing to do what is in our power. For who has ever become poor by sharing with his neighbors? I myself have often given to those in need and received many times as much back from the gods, though I am a poor man of business, and I have never regretted giving. And I do not speak of the present -- for it would be entirely unreasonable to compare a private person's charity with an emperor's provision -- but when I was still a private citizen, I know this happened to me many times. My grandmother's entire estate was restored to me, though it had been violently seized by others, even as I was spending from my small resources on those in need.
We must share our wealth with all human beings, but more generously with the virtuous, and to the poor and destitute enough to relieve their want. I would even say -- paradoxical though it sounds -- that it is right to give clothing and food even to the wicked, for we give to the human being, not to the character. Therefore I think that even those confined in prisons deserve such care. For this philanthropy will not hinder justice. When many are imprisoned awaiting trial, and some will be convicted while others will be acquitted, it would be hard not to show some compassion even to the wicked for the sake of the innocent, rather than to treat even the guiltless with cruelty and inhumanity on account of the wicked.
This thought strikes me as utterly unjust: we call Zeus the god of hospitality, and yet we are more inhospitable than the Scythians. How then can one who wishes to sacrifice to Zeus the Hospitable approach his temple? With what sort of conscience, having forgotten that "all strangers and beggars are from Zeus, and a gift, though small, is welcome"?
How can the man who worships Zeus the god of fellowship, seeing his neighbors in want and not sharing even a drachma, think he is worshipping Zeus properly? When I consider these things I am utterly at a loss, seeing the titles of the gods preserved among us since the beginning of the world like painted images, while in practice nothing of the sort is done by us. The gods are called "gods of kinship" among us, and Zeus is called the god of kinship, yet we treat our relatives as strangers. For every human being is related to every other, whether willingly or not -- whether, as some say, we are all descended from one man and one woman, or whether the gods brought us all into being together with the world at its beginning, not one man and one woman but many men and many women at once.
We must also consider how many arguments the ancients devoted to the proposition that man is by nature a social creature. Shall we, then, who have said and established these things, behave unsociably toward our neighbors? Let each of us, proceeding from such customs and practices, fulfill the works of piety: reverence toward the gods, kindness toward human beings, purity of body. Let each always strive to think reverently about the gods, and gaze upon the sanctuaries and statues of the gods with honor and piety, worshipping them as if the gods were present. For our fathers established statues, altars, the keeping of undying fire, and all such things as symbols of the gods' presence -- not so that we should regard them as gods, but so that through them we might worship the gods. Since we, being in bodies, must render our worship to the gods in bodily form, though they themselves are bodiless, they first showed us the second race of gods -- those who circle the heavens all around -- as images of the first. And since worship could not be rendered to these either in bodily form, for they need nothing by nature, a second kind of image was devised on earth, by performing our rites toward which we shall make the gods favorable to ourselves. Just as those who tend the images of kings, though the kings need nothing, nevertheless draw their goodwill toward themselves, so too those who tend the images of the gods, though the gods need nothing, nevertheless persuade them to help and care for them.
Let us not, then, looking upon the images of the gods, think them to be stones or wood -- nor yet think them to be the gods themselves. Whoever loves the king gladly looks upon the king's image; whoever loves his child gladly looks upon the child's image; whoever loves his father, upon the father's. So too whoever loves the gods gladly gazes upon their images and statues, reverencing them and trembling at the gods who see him from the unseen.